TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceived safety in physical human–robot interaction—A survey
AU - Rubagotti, Matteo
AU - Tusseyeva, Inara
AU - Baltabayeva, Sara
AU - Summers, Danna
AU - Sandygulova, Anara
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Nazarbayev University under Collaborative Research Project no. 091019CRP2118 and Collaborative Research Project no. 091019CRP2107.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - This review paper focuses on different aspects of perceived safety for a number of autonomous physical systems. This is a major aspect of robotics research, as more and more applications allow humans and autonomous systems to share their space, with crucial implications both on safety and on its perception. The alternative terms used to express related concepts (e.g., psychological safety, trust, comfort, stress, fear, and anxiety) are listed and explained. Then, the available methods to assess perceived safety (i.e., questionnaires, physiological measurements, behavioral assessment, and direct input devices) are described. Six categories of autonomous systems are considered (industrial poly-articulated manipulators, indoor mobile robots, mobile manipulators, humanoid robots, drones, and autonomous vehicles), providing an overview of the main themes related to perceived safety in the specific domain, a description of selected works, and an analysis of how motion and characteristics of the system influence the perception of safety. The survey also discusses experimental duration and location of the reviewed papers, and the connection between perceived safety and safety standards.
AB - This review paper focuses on different aspects of perceived safety for a number of autonomous physical systems. This is a major aspect of robotics research, as more and more applications allow humans and autonomous systems to share their space, with crucial implications both on safety and on its perception. The alternative terms used to express related concepts (e.g., psychological safety, trust, comfort, stress, fear, and anxiety) are listed and explained. Then, the available methods to assess perceived safety (i.e., questionnaires, physiological measurements, behavioral assessment, and direct input devices) are described. Six categories of autonomous systems are considered (industrial poly-articulated manipulators, indoor mobile robots, mobile manipulators, humanoid robots, drones, and autonomous vehicles), providing an overview of the main themes related to perceived safety in the specific domain, a description of selected works, and an analysis of how motion and characteristics of the system influence the perception of safety. The survey also discusses experimental duration and location of the reviewed papers, and the connection between perceived safety and safety standards.
KW - Comfort
KW - Perceived safety
KW - Physical human robot interaction
KW - Self-driving cars
KW - Trust
KW - UAVs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124420205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124420205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104047
DO - 10.1016/j.robot.2022.104047
M3 - Short survey
AN - SCOPUS:85124420205
SN - 0921-8890
VL - 151
JO - Robotics and Autonomous Systems
JF - Robotics and Autonomous Systems
M1 - 104047
ER -