Public accounts committees in Eastern and Southern Africa

A comparative analysis

Riccardo Pelizzo, Abel Kinyondo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides the first and most comprehensive analysis of Public Accounts Committees (PACs) from Eastern and Southern Africa building on the work of McGee, Jacobs, Stapenhurst, and Staddon. By analyzing an original set of data, this article shows that PACs in these two regions are bigger, have more staff members, and are more likely to be chaired by opposition Members of Parliament than they have in other countries and regions. Furthermore, the data show that Eastern and Southern African PACs are more active than their counterparts elsewhere. However, lack of political will and limits to the range of powers that they enjoy as well as the dearth of quality technical support from parliamentary staff significantly undermines the effectiveness of these committees and their ability to play a greater role in curbing corruption.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-102
Number of pages26
JournalPolitics and Policy
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Southern Africa
staff
parliament
corruption
opposition
lack
ability

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Budget Implementation
  • Corruption and Development
  • Democracy and Democratization
  • Eastern Africa
  • Effectiveness
  • Government Accountability
  • International Comparative Policy
  • Legislative Oversight
  • PACs
  • Public Accounts Committees
  • Public Administration
  • Public Management
  • Southern Africa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Public accounts committees in Eastern and Southern Africa : A comparative analysis. / Pelizzo, Riccardo; Kinyondo, Abel.

In: Politics and Policy, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2014, p. 77-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15e01654bc654da99b1088fd2e7e5e4d,
title = "Public accounts committees in Eastern and Southern Africa: A comparative analysis",
abstract = "This article provides the first and most comprehensive analysis of Public Accounts Committees (PACs) from Eastern and Southern Africa building on the work of McGee, Jacobs, Stapenhurst, and Staddon. By analyzing an original set of data, this article shows that PACs in these two regions are bigger, have more staff members, and are more likely to be chaired by opposition Members of Parliament than they have in other countries and regions. Furthermore, the data show that Eastern and Southern African PACs are more active than their counterparts elsewhere. However, lack of political will and limits to the range of powers that they enjoy as well as the dearth of quality technical support from parliamentary staff significantly undermines the effectiveness of these committees and their ability to play a greater role in curbing corruption.",
keywords = "Africa, Budget Implementation, Corruption and Development, Democracy and Democratization, Eastern Africa, Effectiveness, Government Accountability, International Comparative Policy, Legislative Oversight, PACs, Public Accounts Committees, Public Administration, Public Management, Southern Africa",
author = "Riccardo Pelizzo and Abel Kinyondo",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/polp.12062",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "77--102",
journal = "Politics and Policy",
issn = "1555-5623",
publisher = "Wiley Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public accounts committees in Eastern and Southern Africa

T2 - A comparative analysis

AU - Pelizzo, Riccardo

AU - Kinyondo, Abel

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article provides the first and most comprehensive analysis of Public Accounts Committees (PACs) from Eastern and Southern Africa building on the work of McGee, Jacobs, Stapenhurst, and Staddon. By analyzing an original set of data, this article shows that PACs in these two regions are bigger, have more staff members, and are more likely to be chaired by opposition Members of Parliament than they have in other countries and regions. Furthermore, the data show that Eastern and Southern African PACs are more active than their counterparts elsewhere. However, lack of political will and limits to the range of powers that they enjoy as well as the dearth of quality technical support from parliamentary staff significantly undermines the effectiveness of these committees and their ability to play a greater role in curbing corruption.

AB - This article provides the first and most comprehensive analysis of Public Accounts Committees (PACs) from Eastern and Southern Africa building on the work of McGee, Jacobs, Stapenhurst, and Staddon. By analyzing an original set of data, this article shows that PACs in these two regions are bigger, have more staff members, and are more likely to be chaired by opposition Members of Parliament than they have in other countries and regions. Furthermore, the data show that Eastern and Southern African PACs are more active than their counterparts elsewhere. However, lack of political will and limits to the range of powers that they enjoy as well as the dearth of quality technical support from parliamentary staff significantly undermines the effectiveness of these committees and their ability to play a greater role in curbing corruption.

KW - Africa

KW - Budget Implementation

KW - Corruption and Development

KW - Democracy and Democratization

KW - Eastern Africa

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Government Accountability

KW - International Comparative Policy

KW - Legislative Oversight

KW - PACs

KW - Public Accounts Committees

KW - Public Administration

KW - Public Management

KW - Southern Africa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84896516303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84896516303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/polp.12062

DO - 10.1111/polp.12062

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 77

EP - 102

JO - Politics and Policy

JF - Politics and Policy

SN - 1555-5623

IS - 1

ER -