Regime type versus patronal politics

a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Barbara Junisbai, Azamat Junisbai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Kazakhstan is home to the longest serving ruler in post-Soviet Eurasia while Kyrgyzstan is among the region’s most competitive polities. Do these regime differences correspond to divergence in political attitudes, as an extensive body of literature posits? Are Kyrgyzstanis more likely to strongly support democratic ideals? Are Kazakhstanis less likely? Contrary to expectations, data reveal the two populations to be attitudinally indistinguishable when it comes to strong support for practices associated with democracy. Whatever country differences we find are minor or statistically insignificant. We explain this convergence by shifting focus away from the political features that distinguish the two nascent democracy versus consolidated authoritarianism to those that they hold in common. Notwithstanding major constitutional reform in Kyrgyzstan in 2010, politics there, as in Kazakhstan, remains fundamentally patronal, or patronage- based. Mass attitudes, we argue, align in many ways with the countries’ shared patronal politics, rather than with their contrasting regime types.

Original languageEnglish
JournalPost-Soviet Affairs
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Kyrgyzstan
Kazakhstan
regime
democracy
constitutional reform
politics
political attitude
authoritarianism
clientelism
divergence
Democracy

Keywords

  • Kazakhstan
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • patronal politics
  • Political attitudes
  • regime type
  • support for democracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Regime type versus patronal politics : a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. / Junisbai, Barbara; Junisbai, Azamat.

In: Post-Soviet Affairs, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c1e133933a00403bb291b2bc61341e9b,
title = "Regime type versus patronal politics: a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan",
abstract = "Kazakhstan is home to the longest serving ruler in post-Soviet Eurasia while Kyrgyzstan is among the region’s most competitive polities. Do these regime differences correspond to divergence in political attitudes, as an extensive body of literature posits? Are Kyrgyzstanis more likely to strongly support democratic ideals? Are Kazakhstanis less likely? Contrary to expectations, data reveal the two populations to be attitudinally indistinguishable when it comes to strong support for practices associated with democracy. Whatever country differences we find are minor or statistically insignificant. We explain this convergence by shifting focus away from the political features that distinguish the two nascent democracy versus consolidated authoritarianism to those that they hold in common. Notwithstanding major constitutional reform in Kyrgyzstan in 2010, politics there, as in Kazakhstan, remains fundamentally patronal, or patronage- based. Mass attitudes, we argue, align in many ways with the countries’ shared patronal politics, rather than with their contrasting regime types.",
keywords = "Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, patronal politics, Political attitudes, regime type, support for democracy",
author = "Barbara Junisbai and Azamat Junisbai",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/1060586X.2019.1568144",
language = "English",
journal = "Post-Soviet Affairs",
issn = "1060-586X",
publisher = "Bellwether Publishing, Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regime type versus patronal politics

T2 - a comparison of “ardent democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

AU - Junisbai, Barbara

AU - Junisbai, Azamat

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Kazakhstan is home to the longest serving ruler in post-Soviet Eurasia while Kyrgyzstan is among the region’s most competitive polities. Do these regime differences correspond to divergence in political attitudes, as an extensive body of literature posits? Are Kyrgyzstanis more likely to strongly support democratic ideals? Are Kazakhstanis less likely? Contrary to expectations, data reveal the two populations to be attitudinally indistinguishable when it comes to strong support for practices associated with democracy. Whatever country differences we find are minor or statistically insignificant. We explain this convergence by shifting focus away from the political features that distinguish the two nascent democracy versus consolidated authoritarianism to those that they hold in common. Notwithstanding major constitutional reform in Kyrgyzstan in 2010, politics there, as in Kazakhstan, remains fundamentally patronal, or patronage- based. Mass attitudes, we argue, align in many ways with the countries’ shared patronal politics, rather than with their contrasting regime types.

AB - Kazakhstan is home to the longest serving ruler in post-Soviet Eurasia while Kyrgyzstan is among the region’s most competitive polities. Do these regime differences correspond to divergence in political attitudes, as an extensive body of literature posits? Are Kyrgyzstanis more likely to strongly support democratic ideals? Are Kazakhstanis less likely? Contrary to expectations, data reveal the two populations to be attitudinally indistinguishable when it comes to strong support for practices associated with democracy. Whatever country differences we find are minor or statistically insignificant. We explain this convergence by shifting focus away from the political features that distinguish the two nascent democracy versus consolidated authoritarianism to those that they hold in common. Notwithstanding major constitutional reform in Kyrgyzstan in 2010, politics there, as in Kazakhstan, remains fundamentally patronal, or patronage- based. Mass attitudes, we argue, align in many ways with the countries’ shared patronal politics, rather than with their contrasting regime types.

KW - Kazakhstan

KW - Kyrgyzstan

KW - patronal politics

KW - Political attitudes

KW - regime type

KW - support for democracy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060807524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060807524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1060586X.2019.1568144

DO - 10.1080/1060586X.2019.1568144

M3 - Article

JO - Post-Soviet Affairs

JF - Post-Soviet Affairs

SN - 1060-586X

ER -