Regulatory risk, borderline legality, fraud and financial restatement

Dmitry Khanin, Raj V. Mahto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - Companies vary in their attitudes toward regulatory (ethics) risk. The purpose of this study is to assess how regulatory risk-averse, risk neutral and risk seeking companies employ distinct managerial risk and slack accumulation strategies and differ in their auditor scores and bankruptcy risk. Design/methodology/approach - The authors test their hypotheses using the GAO-assembled database of financial restatements that allows contrasting voluntary restaters (firms that restated without being prompted either by external auditors or the SEC) and forced restaters (firms requested to restate by the SEC or external auditors). The paper uses logistic regression for comparing different groups of firms to test the hypotheses. Findings - The results of the data analysis mostly supported the hypotheses. The findings suggest that a firm's attitude towards regulatory risk is associated with organizational slack (available and potential), risk (managerial and organizational), and auditor's rating. Research limitations/implications - Some limitations of the study are: use of cross sectional data does not allow testing causal effects, relying on GAO office for categorizing firms in different regulatory category introduces the possibility of bias in analysis, and use of only North American firms in the sample limits the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications - Firms' attitudes toward regulatory risk and their respective risk and slack management strategies could be used to detect fraud early on before such firms transgress from the realm of legality to borderline legality and illegality. Originality/value - Some contributions of the study are: it shows that a firm's fraud tendency or regulatory risk behavior is associated with the type of slack accumulated and available in the firm, regulatory risk-averse companies take less managerial and bankruptcy risks, and earn higher evaluations from auditors, it demonstrates that regulatory risk-averse companies differ from regulatory risk neutral companies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-394
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Accounting and Information Management
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Financial restatements
Fraud
Industry
Logistics
Risk-averse
Auditors
Testing
Bankruptcy
External auditor
Organizational slack
Rating
Evaluation
Logistic regression
Risk seeking
Management strategy
Design methodology
Data base
Causal effect
Hypothesis test
Cross-sectional data

Keywords

  • Borderline legality
  • Fraud
  • Managerial risk
  • Organizational risk
  • Organizational slack
  • Restatements
  • Risk management
  • United States of America

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Management Information Systems

Cite this

Regulatory risk, borderline legality, fraud and financial restatement. / Khanin, Dmitry; Mahto, Raj V.

In: International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2012, p. 377-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{659bee18ea8c427a9d35809badff2ded,
title = "Regulatory risk, borderline legality, fraud and financial restatement",
abstract = "Purpose - Companies vary in their attitudes toward regulatory (ethics) risk. The purpose of this study is to assess how regulatory risk-averse, risk neutral and risk seeking companies employ distinct managerial risk and slack accumulation strategies and differ in their auditor scores and bankruptcy risk. Design/methodology/approach - The authors test their hypotheses using the GAO-assembled database of financial restatements that allows contrasting voluntary restaters (firms that restated without being prompted either by external auditors or the SEC) and forced restaters (firms requested to restate by the SEC or external auditors). The paper uses logistic regression for comparing different groups of firms to test the hypotheses. Findings - The results of the data analysis mostly supported the hypotheses. The findings suggest that a firm's attitude towards regulatory risk is associated with organizational slack (available and potential), risk (managerial and organizational), and auditor's rating. Research limitations/implications - Some limitations of the study are: use of cross sectional data does not allow testing causal effects, relying on GAO office for categorizing firms in different regulatory category introduces the possibility of bias in analysis, and use of only North American firms in the sample limits the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications - Firms' attitudes toward regulatory risk and their respective risk and slack management strategies could be used to detect fraud early on before such firms transgress from the realm of legality to borderline legality and illegality. Originality/value - Some contributions of the study are: it shows that a firm's fraud tendency or regulatory risk behavior is associated with the type of slack accumulated and available in the firm, regulatory risk-averse companies take less managerial and bankruptcy risks, and earn higher evaluations from auditors, it demonstrates that regulatory risk-averse companies differ from regulatory risk neutral companies.",
keywords = "Borderline legality, Fraud, Managerial risk, Organizational risk, Organizational slack, Restatements, Risk management, United States of America",
author = "Dmitry Khanin and Mahto, {Raj V.}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1108/18347641211272713",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "377--394",
journal = "International Journal of Accounting and Information Management",
issn = "1834-7649",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulatory risk, borderline legality, fraud and financial restatement

AU - Khanin, Dmitry

AU - Mahto, Raj V.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose - Companies vary in their attitudes toward regulatory (ethics) risk. The purpose of this study is to assess how regulatory risk-averse, risk neutral and risk seeking companies employ distinct managerial risk and slack accumulation strategies and differ in their auditor scores and bankruptcy risk. Design/methodology/approach - The authors test their hypotheses using the GAO-assembled database of financial restatements that allows contrasting voluntary restaters (firms that restated without being prompted either by external auditors or the SEC) and forced restaters (firms requested to restate by the SEC or external auditors). The paper uses logistic regression for comparing different groups of firms to test the hypotheses. Findings - The results of the data analysis mostly supported the hypotheses. The findings suggest that a firm's attitude towards regulatory risk is associated with organizational slack (available and potential), risk (managerial and organizational), and auditor's rating. Research limitations/implications - Some limitations of the study are: use of cross sectional data does not allow testing causal effects, relying on GAO office for categorizing firms in different regulatory category introduces the possibility of bias in analysis, and use of only North American firms in the sample limits the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications - Firms' attitudes toward regulatory risk and their respective risk and slack management strategies could be used to detect fraud early on before such firms transgress from the realm of legality to borderline legality and illegality. Originality/value - Some contributions of the study are: it shows that a firm's fraud tendency or regulatory risk behavior is associated with the type of slack accumulated and available in the firm, regulatory risk-averse companies take less managerial and bankruptcy risks, and earn higher evaluations from auditors, it demonstrates that regulatory risk-averse companies differ from regulatory risk neutral companies.

AB - Purpose - Companies vary in their attitudes toward regulatory (ethics) risk. The purpose of this study is to assess how regulatory risk-averse, risk neutral and risk seeking companies employ distinct managerial risk and slack accumulation strategies and differ in their auditor scores and bankruptcy risk. Design/methodology/approach - The authors test their hypotheses using the GAO-assembled database of financial restatements that allows contrasting voluntary restaters (firms that restated without being prompted either by external auditors or the SEC) and forced restaters (firms requested to restate by the SEC or external auditors). The paper uses logistic regression for comparing different groups of firms to test the hypotheses. Findings - The results of the data analysis mostly supported the hypotheses. The findings suggest that a firm's attitude towards regulatory risk is associated with organizational slack (available and potential), risk (managerial and organizational), and auditor's rating. Research limitations/implications - Some limitations of the study are: use of cross sectional data does not allow testing causal effects, relying on GAO office for categorizing firms in different regulatory category introduces the possibility of bias in analysis, and use of only North American firms in the sample limits the generalizability of the findings. Practical implications - Firms' attitudes toward regulatory risk and their respective risk and slack management strategies could be used to detect fraud early on before such firms transgress from the realm of legality to borderline legality and illegality. Originality/value - Some contributions of the study are: it shows that a firm's fraud tendency or regulatory risk behavior is associated with the type of slack accumulated and available in the firm, regulatory risk-averse companies take less managerial and bankruptcy risks, and earn higher evaluations from auditors, it demonstrates that regulatory risk-averse companies differ from regulatory risk neutral companies.

KW - Borderline legality

KW - Fraud

KW - Managerial risk

KW - Organizational risk

KW - Organizational slack

KW - Restatements

KW - Risk management

KW - United States of America

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867061732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867061732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/18347641211272713

DO - 10.1108/18347641211272713

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 377

EP - 394

JO - International Journal of Accounting and Information Management

JF - International Journal of Accounting and Information Management

SN - 1834-7649

IS - 4

ER -