Review design of concrete structures

Evaluating learning effectiveness

Martin Jaeger, Abdullah Al-Mughrabi, Mona Reda, Desmond Adair

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze learning effectiveness when students are in training to review the design of concrete structures. Two different course delivery methods for vocational engineering students are compared. The first delivery method begins with a traditional instructional approach followed by an active learning approach. The second delivery method utilizes the same approaches, but in reversed order. The difference in learning effectiveness of the two approaches is analyzed, based on a semi-quasi pre-test/post-test experiment design with an experimental group (first hands-on, then theory) and a control group (first theory, then hands-on). Based on 30 test questions and difference scores between pre-test and two post-tests, as well as statistical significance and effect size, the learning effectiveness is determined. It was found that the learning effectiveness for both experimental and control group was higher during the hands-on approaches. When comparing the second post-test with the first post-test, the experimental group had only 2 positive difference scores, whereas the control group had 13 positive difference scores. The findings indicate that students need sufficient initial theoretical background in order to benefit from a hands-on approach.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities"
PublisherIEEE Computer Society
Pages87-92
Number of pages6
Volume10-13-April-2016
ISBN (Electronic)9781467386333
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 19 2016
Event2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016 - Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Duration: Apr 10 2016Apr 13 2016

Other

Other2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016
CountryUnited Arab Emirates
CityAbu Dhabi
Period4/10/164/13/16

Fingerprint

Concrete construction
Students
learning
Group theory
Statistical tests
Group
student
statistical significance
Experiments
engineering
experiment
Problem-Based Learning
Pre-test

Keywords

  • active learning
  • concrete structures
  • design review
  • learning effectiveness

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Education

Cite this

Jaeger, M., Al-Mughrabi, A., Reda, M., & Adair, D. (2016). Review design of concrete structures: Evaluating learning effectiveness. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities" (Vol. 10-13-April-2016, pp. 87-92). [7474536] IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474536

Review design of concrete structures : Evaluating learning effectiveness. / Jaeger, Martin; Al-Mughrabi, Abdullah; Reda, Mona; Adair, Desmond.

Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". Vol. 10-13-April-2016 IEEE Computer Society, 2016. p. 87-92 7474536.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Jaeger, M, Al-Mughrabi, A, Reda, M & Adair, D 2016, Review design of concrete structures: Evaluating learning effectiveness. in Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". vol. 10-13-April-2016, 7474536, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 87-92, 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 4/10/16. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474536
Jaeger M, Al-Mughrabi A, Reda M, Adair D. Review design of concrete structures: Evaluating learning effectiveness. In Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". Vol. 10-13-April-2016. IEEE Computer Society. 2016. p. 87-92. 7474536 https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474536
Jaeger, Martin ; Al-Mughrabi, Abdullah ; Reda, Mona ; Adair, Desmond. / Review design of concrete structures : Evaluating learning effectiveness. Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities". Vol. 10-13-April-2016 IEEE Computer Society, 2016. pp. 87-92
@inproceedings{b11acef8160c4396b64a88bb33691c7f,
title = "Review design of concrete structures: Evaluating learning effectiveness",
abstract = "The purpose of this study is to analyze learning effectiveness when students are in training to review the design of concrete structures. Two different course delivery methods for vocational engineering students are compared. The first delivery method begins with a traditional instructional approach followed by an active learning approach. The second delivery method utilizes the same approaches, but in reversed order. The difference in learning effectiveness of the two approaches is analyzed, based on a semi-quasi pre-test/post-test experiment design with an experimental group (first hands-on, then theory) and a control group (first theory, then hands-on). Based on 30 test questions and difference scores between pre-test and two post-tests, as well as statistical significance and effect size, the learning effectiveness is determined. It was found that the learning effectiveness for both experimental and control group was higher during the hands-on approaches. When comparing the second post-test with the first post-test, the experimental group had only 2 positive difference scores, whereas the control group had 13 positive difference scores. The findings indicate that students need sufficient initial theoretical background in order to benefit from a hands-on approach.",
keywords = "active learning, concrete structures, design review, learning effectiveness",
author = "Martin Jaeger and Abdullah Al-Mughrabi and Mona Reda and Desmond Adair",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474536",
language = "English",
volume = "10-13-April-2016",
pages = "87--92",
booktitle = "Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: {"}Smart Education in Smart Cities{"}",
publisher = "IEEE Computer Society",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Review design of concrete structures

T2 - Evaluating learning effectiveness

AU - Jaeger, Martin

AU - Al-Mughrabi, Abdullah

AU - Reda, Mona

AU - Adair, Desmond

PY - 2016/5/19

Y1 - 2016/5/19

N2 - The purpose of this study is to analyze learning effectiveness when students are in training to review the design of concrete structures. Two different course delivery methods for vocational engineering students are compared. The first delivery method begins with a traditional instructional approach followed by an active learning approach. The second delivery method utilizes the same approaches, but in reversed order. The difference in learning effectiveness of the two approaches is analyzed, based on a semi-quasi pre-test/post-test experiment design with an experimental group (first hands-on, then theory) and a control group (first theory, then hands-on). Based on 30 test questions and difference scores between pre-test and two post-tests, as well as statistical significance and effect size, the learning effectiveness is determined. It was found that the learning effectiveness for both experimental and control group was higher during the hands-on approaches. When comparing the second post-test with the first post-test, the experimental group had only 2 positive difference scores, whereas the control group had 13 positive difference scores. The findings indicate that students need sufficient initial theoretical background in order to benefit from a hands-on approach.

AB - The purpose of this study is to analyze learning effectiveness when students are in training to review the design of concrete structures. Two different course delivery methods for vocational engineering students are compared. The first delivery method begins with a traditional instructional approach followed by an active learning approach. The second delivery method utilizes the same approaches, but in reversed order. The difference in learning effectiveness of the two approaches is analyzed, based on a semi-quasi pre-test/post-test experiment design with an experimental group (first hands-on, then theory) and a control group (first theory, then hands-on). Based on 30 test questions and difference scores between pre-test and two post-tests, as well as statistical significance and effect size, the learning effectiveness is determined. It was found that the learning effectiveness for both experimental and control group was higher during the hands-on approaches. When comparing the second post-test with the first post-test, the experimental group had only 2 positive difference scores, whereas the control group had 13 positive difference scores. The findings indicate that students need sufficient initial theoretical background in order to benefit from a hands-on approach.

KW - active learning

KW - concrete structures

KW - design review

KW - learning effectiveness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994639475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994639475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474536

DO - 10.1109/EDUCON.2016.7474536

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 10-13-April-2016

SP - 87

EP - 92

BT - Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON 2016: "Smart Education in Smart Cities"

PB - IEEE Computer Society

ER -