Robust, flexible and operational mine design strategies

B. Groeneveld, E. Topal, B. Leenders

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Strategic planning in mining is an important value accretive process. One of the most essential aspects during the planning phase is determining the correct system design. A traditional mine design process develops a fixed system for one set of conditions or expected values. An alternative is to develop a robust system that deals with variation, by handling a range of conditions within the optimisation process. Conversely, a flexible design can be generated which changes the system dynamically over time in response to change. It is hypothesised that a flexible design generates more value than a robust design which in turn generates more value than a traditional design. However, due to constant change, a fully flexible design is not practical. Ideally, a hybrid of the two methods would be optimal. An operational design is proposed as a manual solution to this problem. This paper compares these different new design methodologies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-28
Number of pages9
JournalTransactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology
Volume121
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Strategic planning
Systems analysis
Planning
methodology
planning
method

Keywords

  • Decision making
  • Flexible mine design
  • Mine design
  • Robust mine design
  • Strategic planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geology

Cite this

Robust, flexible and operational mine design strategies. / Groeneveld, B.; Topal, E.; Leenders, B.

In: Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology, Vol. 121, No. 1, 2012, p. 20-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a561ae10e9794134b38377435bbfce3e,
title = "Robust, flexible and operational mine design strategies",
abstract = "Strategic planning in mining is an important value accretive process. One of the most essential aspects during the planning phase is determining the correct system design. A traditional mine design process develops a fixed system for one set of conditions or expected values. An alternative is to develop a robust system that deals with variation, by handling a range of conditions within the optimisation process. Conversely, a flexible design can be generated which changes the system dynamically over time in response to change. It is hypothesised that a flexible design generates more value than a robust design which in turn generates more value than a traditional design. However, due to constant change, a fully flexible design is not practical. Ideally, a hybrid of the two methods would be optimal. An operational design is proposed as a manual solution to this problem. This paper compares these different new design methodologies.",
keywords = "Decision making, Flexible mine design, Mine design, Robust mine design, Strategic planning",
author = "B. Groeneveld and E. Topal and B. Leenders",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1179/1743286311Y.0000000018",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "20--28",
journal = "Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology",
issn = "1474-9009",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robust, flexible and operational mine design strategies

AU - Groeneveld, B.

AU - Topal, E.

AU - Leenders, B.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Strategic planning in mining is an important value accretive process. One of the most essential aspects during the planning phase is determining the correct system design. A traditional mine design process develops a fixed system for one set of conditions or expected values. An alternative is to develop a robust system that deals with variation, by handling a range of conditions within the optimisation process. Conversely, a flexible design can be generated which changes the system dynamically over time in response to change. It is hypothesised that a flexible design generates more value than a robust design which in turn generates more value than a traditional design. However, due to constant change, a fully flexible design is not practical. Ideally, a hybrid of the two methods would be optimal. An operational design is proposed as a manual solution to this problem. This paper compares these different new design methodologies.

AB - Strategic planning in mining is an important value accretive process. One of the most essential aspects during the planning phase is determining the correct system design. A traditional mine design process develops a fixed system for one set of conditions or expected values. An alternative is to develop a robust system that deals with variation, by handling a range of conditions within the optimisation process. Conversely, a flexible design can be generated which changes the system dynamically over time in response to change. It is hypothesised that a flexible design generates more value than a robust design which in turn generates more value than a traditional design. However, due to constant change, a fully flexible design is not practical. Ideally, a hybrid of the two methods would be optimal. An operational design is proposed as a manual solution to this problem. This paper compares these different new design methodologies.

KW - Decision making

KW - Flexible mine design

KW - Mine design

KW - Robust mine design

KW - Strategic planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859089461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859089461&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1179/1743286311Y.0000000018

DO - 10.1179/1743286311Y.0000000018

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 20

EP - 28

JO - Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology

JF - Transactions of the Institutions of Mining and Metallurgy, Section A: Mining Technology

SN - 1474-9009

IS - 1

ER -