Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Seasonal characterisation of municipal solid waste from Astana city, Kazakhstan: Composition and thermal properties of combustible fraction

  • Nazarbayev University
  • Ingenieurgesellschaft Prof. Czurda und Partner mbH (ICP)
  • The Environment & Resource Efficiency Cluster (EREC)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study presents the results of a seasonal municipal solid waste composition campaign, that took place over the period of September 2017 to June 2018 in the capital city of Kazakhstan, Astana. Four sampling campaigns were conducted in order to identify the seasonal variation of municipal solid waste composition, recyclables and energy potential materials, such as combustible fraction, useful for the evaluation of waste-to-energy potential. The combustible fraction was analysed for thermal fuel properties, such as proximate and elemental analyses and gross calorific value. The results over the four different seasons showed that the average recyclable fraction of municipal solid waste on a wet basis of 33.3 wt.% and combustibles fraction was 8.3 wt.%. The largest fraction was the organics (47.2 wt.%), followed by plastic (15.4 wt.%) and paper (12.5 wt.%). Small seasonal variations were observed for organics, paper, plastic and glass fractions. The highest values were found in summer for the organic waste, in spring for paper and plastic and autumn for glass. The recyclables fraction showed an absolute seasonal variation of 5.7% with a peak in the winter season (35.4%) and the combustibles fraction showed a seasonal variation between 8.3 wt.% to 9.4 wt.%. Finally, the average calorific value of the combustible fraction was estimated to be 21.6 MJ kg-1 on a dry basis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1271-1281
Number of pages11
JournalWaste Management and Research
Volume37
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Funding

Abylkhani Bexultan 1 2 3 Aiymbetov Berik 1 Yagofarova Almira 1 2 3 Tokmurzin Diyar 1 Venetis Christos 4 Poulopoulos Stavros 2 3 Sarbassov Yerbol 1 2 3 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-0417 Inglezakis Vassilis J 2 3 1 Green Energy and Environment Laboratory, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan 2 Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan 3 The Environment and Resource Efficiency Cluster, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan 4 Ingenieurgesellschaft Prof. Czurda und Partner mbH, Karlsruhe, Germany Vassilis J Inglezakis, Environmental Science and Technology Group, Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, School of Engineering, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan. Email: [email protected] 10 2019 0734242X19875503 14 11 2018 20 8 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 2019 International Solid Waste Association This study presents the results of a seasonal municipal solid waste composition campaign, that took place over the period of September 2017 to June 2018 in the capital city of Kazakhstan, Astana. Four sampling campaigns were conducted in order to identify the seasonal variation of municipal solid waste composition, recyclables and energy potential materials, such as combustible fraction, useful for the evaluation of waste-to-energy potential. The combustible fraction was analysed for thermal fuel properties, such as proximate and elemental analyses and gross calorific value. The results over the four different seasons showed that the average recyclable fraction of municipal solid waste on a wet basis of 33.3 wt.% and combustibles fraction was 8.3 wt.%. The largest fraction was the organics (47.2 wt.%), followed by plastic (15.4 wt.%) and paper (12.5 wt.%). Small seasonal variations were observed for organics, paper, plastic and glass fractions. The highest values were found in summer for the organic waste, in spring for paper and plastic and autumn for glass. The recyclables fraction showed an absolute seasonal variation of 5.7% with a peak in the winter season (35.4%) and the combustibles fraction showed a seasonal variation between 8.3 wt.% to 9.4 wt.%. Finally, the average calorific value of the combustible fraction was estimated to be 21.6 MJ kg -1 on a dry basis. Municipal solid waste composition recyclables combustible fraction refuse derive fuel gross calorific value Nazarbayev University ORAU contract 144-2018/010-2018 edited-state corrected-proof The authors would like to thank the Municipality of Astana city for the support provided during sampling campaigns at the landfill site. Declaration of conflicting interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The project was financially supported by the Nazarbayev University (NU) research project entitled ‘Development of municipal solid waste combustion and incineration technology for Astana (Kazakhstan) and investigation of municipal solid waste blending effects on reactivity of coals in CFB combustion and gasification processes’ [ORAU contract 284-2019/012-2019]. ORCID iD Vassilis J Inglezakis https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-0417

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  2. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  3. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • combustible fraction
  • gross calorific value
  • Municipal solid waste composition
  • recyclables
  • refuse derive fuel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Pollution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Seasonal characterisation of municipal solid waste from Astana city, Kazakhstan: Composition and thermal properties of combustible fraction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this