TY - JOUR
T1 - Stakeholder perspectives on the costs and benefits of circular construction
AU - Karaca, Ferhat
AU - Tleuken, Aidana
AU - Awan, Hamad Hassan
AU - Askar, Rand
AU - Çıdık, Mustafa Selçuk
AU - Iskakova, Anel
AU - Turkyilmaz, Ali
AU - Laudal, Thomas
AU - Durdyev, Serdar
AU - Varol, Huseyin Atakan
AU - Salles, Adriana
AU - Bajāre, Diāna
AU - Tambovceva, Tatjana
AU - Zsembinszki, Gabriel
AU - Puma, Genesis Camila Cervantes
AU - Kapsalyamova, Zhanna
AU - Kripa, Dorina
AU - Azhgaliyeva, Dina
AU - Nano, Xhesila
AU - Cabeza, Luisa F.
AU - Bragança, Luís
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - The construction industry significantly impacts the environment through natural resource depletion and energy consumption, leading to environmental degradation. Circular Economy (CE) material efficiency strategies—such as material reuse, design for disassembly, prefabrication, and recycling—offer promising solutions for reducing resource consumption and waste. This paper explores stakeholders’ perspectives on the costs and benefits of implementing CE material efficiency strategies in the construction industry, using the 3-R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) framework. By analyzing data from 382 participants, it assesses perceptions of costs and benefits, uncovering regional differences. The findings highlight that studied European stakeholders prioritize reuse and design for disassembly, while studied non-European countries focus on offsite production and material reuse optimization. Despite these differences, both groups view waste reduction as a key benefit, due to the cost savings it provides. By highlighting regional drivers and barriers to CE adoption, this research establishes a foundation for developing targeted policies and collaborative strategies to advance CE implementation in construction worldwide.
AB - The construction industry significantly impacts the environment through natural resource depletion and energy consumption, leading to environmental degradation. Circular Economy (CE) material efficiency strategies—such as material reuse, design for disassembly, prefabrication, and recycling—offer promising solutions for reducing resource consumption and waste. This paper explores stakeholders’ perspectives on the costs and benefits of implementing CE material efficiency strategies in the construction industry, using the 3-R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) framework. By analyzing data from 382 participants, it assesses perceptions of costs and benefits, uncovering regional differences. The findings highlight that studied European stakeholders prioritize reuse and design for disassembly, while studied non-European countries focus on offsite production and material reuse optimization. Despite these differences, both groups view waste reduction as a key benefit, due to the cost savings it provides. By highlighting regional drivers and barriers to CE adoption, this research establishes a foundation for developing targeted policies and collaborative strategies to advance CE implementation in construction worldwide.
KW - Circular economy
KW - Construction industry
KW - Machine learning
KW - Recycling
KW - Reuse
KW - Waste management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85211332044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85211332044&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-024-81741-z
DO - 10.1038/s41598-024-81741-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 39627465
AN - SCOPUS:85211332044
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 14
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 30039
ER -