TY - GEN
T1 - Statistical analysis of the pecto-intercostal fascial plane block on pain-related outcomes in cardiac surgery
AU - Abdildin, Yerkin
AU - Nabidollayeva, Fatima
AU - Viderman, Dmitriy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Treatment of pain is a primary objective in medical hospitals and various plane blocks are used for this purpose. However, the effect of the pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFPB) in cardiac surgery was not studied systematically. In this work, we conduct a statistical analysis of reported data from different countries. The objective of our study was to evaluate pain reduction after the PIFPB in cardiac surgery. We found two studies that reported slightly different pain scores, namely, pain measured at rest and with movement. The model favors the experimental (bupivacaine, ropivacaine) group over the control (placebo) group in terms of postoperative pain (SMD with 95% CI is –1.29 [–1.68, – 0.89], p-value < 0.00001). However, the total length of hospital stay was longer in the experimental group with a mean difference of 1.35 days with 95% CI [1.04, 1.66] and p-value < 0.00001. The model showed no significant difference between groups in opioid consumption. To summarize, PIFPB after cardiac surgery reduces pain intensity scores but results in longer hospital stays. More trials should be done in the future to examine the effect of PIFPB on other medical outcomes.
AB - Treatment of pain is a primary objective in medical hospitals and various plane blocks are used for this purpose. However, the effect of the pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFPB) in cardiac surgery was not studied systematically. In this work, we conduct a statistical analysis of reported data from different countries. The objective of our study was to evaluate pain reduction after the PIFPB in cardiac surgery. We found two studies that reported slightly different pain scores, namely, pain measured at rest and with movement. The model favors the experimental (bupivacaine, ropivacaine) group over the control (placebo) group in terms of postoperative pain (SMD with 95% CI is –1.29 [–1.68, – 0.89], p-value < 0.00001). However, the total length of hospital stay was longer in the experimental group with a mean difference of 1.35 days with 95% CI [1.04, 1.66] and p-value < 0.00001. The model showed no significant difference between groups in opioid consumption. To summarize, PIFPB after cardiac surgery reduces pain intensity scores but results in longer hospital stays. More trials should be done in the future to examine the effect of PIFPB on other medical outcomes.
KW - evidence-based medicine
KW - meta-analysis
KW - opioid consumption
KW - pain reduction
KW - plane blocks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202815646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85202815646&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/SIST61555.2024.10629485
DO - 10.1109/SIST61555.2024.10629485
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85202815646
T3 - SIST 2024 - 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings
SP - 39
EP - 43
BT - SIST 2024 - 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 4th IEEE International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies, SIST 2024
Y2 - 15 May 2024 through 17 May 2024
ER -