TY - JOUR
T1 - Stochastic modeling of iron in coal seams using two-point and multiple-point geostatistics
T2 - A case study
AU - Abulkhair, Sultan
AU - Madani, Nasser
N1 - Funding Information:
Both authors are grateful to Nazarbayev University for funding this work via Faculty Development Competitive Research Grants for 2018–2020 under Contract No. 090118FD5336 and 2021–2023 under Contract No. 021220FD4951. The research of the first author was partially supported by the Australian Research Council Integrated Operations for Complex Resources Industrial Transformation Training Centre (project number IC190100017) and funded by universities, industry and the Australian Government. The authors also thank the Research & Development Engineering Center of Eurasian Resources Group (ERG) in Kazakhstan for providing the coal dataset and support this work under the contract number SD/SCERG/18-9792, and acknowledge the kind cooperation of Dr. Philippe Renard for permission to use the AR2GEMS software. The editorial team and two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged for helping to improve the paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Inc.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This work addresses the problem of quantifying iron content in a coal deposit in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The process of resource estimation in the mining industry usually involves building geological domains and then estimating the grade of interest within them. In coal deposits, the seam layers usually define the estimation domains. However, the main issue with the coal deposit in this study is that the iron dataset is solely based on data from three newly drilled drill holes located a significant distance apart and additional rock samples from stopes. A massive amount of geological information comes from legacy drill hole data sampled a long time ago, but there is no evidence of proper QA/QC being performed on those samples. For this reason, a workflow was introduced to construct a representative training image from legacy data and stochastically model geological domains within these three drill holes using a multiple-point geostatistics technique. Once the geological model was obtained, a two-point geostatistics algorithm was applied to model the iron inside each geological domain. The results showed that direct sampling (DeeSse) is a suitable multiple-point geostatistics algorithm that can reproduce the long-range connectivity and curvilinear features of seam layers. Furthermore, a sequential Gaussian simulation was used to model the iron in the corresponding domains. Both methods were extensively evaluated using different statistical tools and analyses.
AB - This work addresses the problem of quantifying iron content in a coal deposit in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The process of resource estimation in the mining industry usually involves building geological domains and then estimating the grade of interest within them. In coal deposits, the seam layers usually define the estimation domains. However, the main issue with the coal deposit in this study is that the iron dataset is solely based on data from three newly drilled drill holes located a significant distance apart and additional rock samples from stopes. A massive amount of geological information comes from legacy drill hole data sampled a long time ago, but there is no evidence of proper QA/QC being performed on those samples. For this reason, a workflow was introduced to construct a representative training image from legacy data and stochastically model geological domains within these three drill holes using a multiple-point geostatistics technique. Once the geological model was obtained, a two-point geostatistics algorithm was applied to model the iron inside each geological domain. The results showed that direct sampling (DeeSse) is a suitable multiple-point geostatistics algorithm that can reproduce the long-range connectivity and curvilinear features of seam layers. Furthermore, a sequential Gaussian simulation was used to model the iron in the corresponding domains. Both methods were extensively evaluated using different statistical tools and analyses.
KW - Coal deposit
KW - Direct sampling
KW - Multiple-point statistics
KW - Resource modeling
KW - Sequential Gaussian simulation
KW - Training image
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127451005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85127451005&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s42461-022-00586-0
DO - 10.1007/s42461-022-00586-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85127451005
SN - 2524-3462
VL - 39
SP - 1313
EP - 1331
JO - Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
JF - Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration
IS - 3
ER -