TY - CONF
T1 - STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING:
T2 - IT STARTS WITH THE TEACHER
AU - Omarbekova, Gulnara
N1 - Abadi, M. C. 2000. Proverbs as ESL curriculum. In: Proverbium. 17. 1–22.
Bakhtin, M.M.2016. Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. St. Petersburg: Azbuka-Atticus, 416.
Belova, S. V. 2002. Dialogue is the basis of the teaching profession: Study guide. Moscow: APKiPRO. 146.
Bibler, V.S. 2001. Culture. Dialogue of cultures. In: Questions of philosophy. #6.109-112.
Dabaghi A., Pishbin E., Niknasab L. 2010. Proverbs from the Viewpoint of Translation. In: Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 1. # 6. 807–814.
Dearden, J. 2015. English as a medium of instruction – a growing global phenomenon. https://www.britishcouncil.es/sites/
Gibbs, R. W., Beitel D. 2003. What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Cognition, Comprehension and Communication. A Decade of North American Proverb Studies (1990–2000). Mieder W. ed. Hohengehren, Schneider-Verlag, 37–52.
Güven, F. 2020. Framework of Kazakh Language and Turkology Department, Nazarbaev University.
Jaime Saavedra, 2020. COVID-19: More Than a Billion Students Aren’t in Class – How Do We Educate During a Pandemic? https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/video/2020/05/11/how-to-educate-during-a-pandemic
Johnson, D., & R. Johnson. 2017. An Overview of Cooperative Learning. http://www.co-operation.org/what-is-cooperative-learning
Kurganov, S. Yu. 2000. “Pedagogy of Sergei Kurganov”. In: First September. #55. Access mode: http://ps.1september.ru/in dex1.php? year = 2000 & num = 55 (date accessed: 09/12/2020).
Leontovich, O. A. 2005. Russians and Americans: paradoxes of intercultural communication: monograph. Moscow: Gnosis, 352.
Likhanova, V.V. 2010. Formation of intercultural competence of students at non-linguistic universities by means of local history material. Dissertation for candidate of pedagogical sciences: Buryat. state University:Ulan-Ude, 217.
Mieder, W.1994. Paremiological minimum and cultural literacy. Wise Words. Essays on the Proverb. Mieder W. ed. New York, Garland Publishing Inc., 297–316.
Mironov, V.V. 2005. Philosophy and metamorphoses of culture. Moscow:Aleteya, 150-152.
Ter-Minasova, S.G. 2008. War and the world of languages and cultures. Moscow: Slovo. 344.
The Bologna Process 2020 – The European Higher Education Area in the new decade. Communiqué of the Conference of European Ministers Responsible for Higher Education (Leuven and Louvain-laNeuve, April 28–29 2009). Louvain-la-Neuve, 2009. URL: http://ehea.info/Upload/document/ministerial_declarations/Leuven_Louvain_la_Neuve_Communique_April_2009_595061.pdf (accessed 19/06/2021)
Raymond, J. 1948. Proverbs and language teaching. In: Modern Language Journal. 32.522–523.
Rogers, C. 2007. The Necessary and Sufficient Conditions of Therapeutic Personality Change. In: Psychotherapy. #44 (3). 240–248.
Serikov, V.V. 1994. Personality-oriented education. In: Pedagogy. # 5.
Sronce, R., Li L. 2011. Catching flies with honey: Using Chinese and American proverbs to teach cultural dimensions. In: International Journal of Management Education.9 (2).1–11.
Steger, M., 2003. Globalisation: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Sursock, A. Trends. 2015: Learning and Teaching in European Universities. Brussels, EUA.128. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279950904_Trends_2015_Learning_and_Teaching_in_European_Universities (accessed 16/09/2021)
Vella, J. 2002. Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vella, J. 2008. On teaching and learning: Putting the principles and practices of dialogue education into action. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 272.
Warming R., Frydensberg P. 2017. Principal in Own Learning - Student Centered Learning Viewed Through the Eyes of an External Quality Assurance Agency, EQAF, http://www.eua.be/Libraries/EQAF-2017/ p9_frydensberg_warming.pdf?sfvrsn=0
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - . The use of student-centred teaching methods is a significant challenge for all secondary and tertiary education teachers. Since joining the Bologna Process, more attention has been paid to student-centred learning in Kazakhstani education and discussed in all education sectors. Having experienced mainly teacher-centred learning approaches, teachers still need some methodological help to avoid traditional teaching. This article discusses ideas for student-centred teaching methods. The Dialogue method is explored as an active and cooperative teaching method. The term "dialogue of cultures" is utilised for a student-centred teaching methodology based on the dialogue in the online "Language and Globalization" course. By engaging in dialogue, students interact with each other; it helps increase students' interpersonal, presentation, interpretive and intercultural speech activity and is one of the most effective means of forming a linguistic personality. This approach also fosters creativity and deep thinking when used alongside various virtual educational tools. In a student-centred learning environment, professors and students learn together through stimulating, interactive and thought-provoking experiences; this is generally believed to improve teaching (Warming&Frydensberg, 2017) and student learning. Students develop cross-cultural, critical thinking and active citizenship skills and are thus better prepared for the current and future labour market and social membership.
AB - . The use of student-centred teaching methods is a significant challenge for all secondary and tertiary education teachers. Since joining the Bologna Process, more attention has been paid to student-centred learning in Kazakhstani education and discussed in all education sectors. Having experienced mainly teacher-centred learning approaches, teachers still need some methodological help to avoid traditional teaching. This article discusses ideas for student-centred teaching methods. The Dialogue method is explored as an active and cooperative teaching method. The term "dialogue of cultures" is utilised for a student-centred teaching methodology based on the dialogue in the online "Language and Globalization" course. By engaging in dialogue, students interact with each other; it helps increase students' interpersonal, presentation, interpretive and intercultural speech activity and is one of the most effective means of forming a linguistic personality. This approach also fosters creativity and deep thinking when used alongside various virtual educational tools. In a student-centred learning environment, professors and students learn together through stimulating, interactive and thought-provoking experiences; this is generally believed to improve teaching (Warming&Frydensberg, 2017) and student learning. Students develop cross-cultural, critical thinking and active citizenship skills and are thus better prepared for the current and future labour market and social membership.
KW - student-centred teaching, Kazakhstani education, "dialogue of cultures" approach
M3 - Paper
SP - 93
ER -