The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries

Colin Gerard Knox, Saltanat Janenova

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the emergence of e-government in post-Soviet countries using Kazakhstan as a case study. Extant research on e-government in developing countries highlights significant benefits including improved public services, reduced corruption, and more open and inclusive government. The paper asserts the presence of an e-government paradox which limits its potential to improve public services. Design/methodology/approach: Primary data were collected from a number of sources: 6 focus groups with central government agencies, local authorities and civil society organisations; 25 structured and semi-structured interviews; and participant observation. Findings: The research finds evidence of an e-government paradox in five forms: an emphasis on technological development; transactional services are faster but have displaced attention from core public services; petty corruption has been reduced but grand corruption remains; isomorphic mimicry; and greater participation by citizens has been limited. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the research is Kazakhstan. Applying the lessons learned to other post-Soviet countries has limitations given their different stages of development since independence. Practical implications: The key practical implication of this research is that countries can become absorbed by e-government technology without questioning the fundamental business model which underpins how public services are delivered. Ultimately, this impacts on the social value of e-government. Originality/value: While existing research has examined how e-government has been implemented in developing countries, this paper focusses on Kazakhstan as an authoritarian state with wider implications for post-Soviet countries.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

electronic government
public service
Kazakhstan
corruption
developing country
developing world
mimicry
technical development
government agency
participant observation
technological development
civil society
Values
citizen
participation
methodology
interview
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • E-government
  • Kazakhstan
  • Post-Soviet countries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Public Administration
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries. / Knox, Colin Gerard; Janenova, Saltanat.

In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44d68578bae04f63ba321ca1e8801b6b,
title = "The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the emergence of e-government in post-Soviet countries using Kazakhstan as a case study. Extant research on e-government in developing countries highlights significant benefits including improved public services, reduced corruption, and more open and inclusive government. The paper asserts the presence of an e-government paradox which limits its potential to improve public services. Design/methodology/approach: Primary data were collected from a number of sources: 6 focus groups with central government agencies, local authorities and civil society organisations; 25 structured and semi-structured interviews; and participant observation. Findings: The research finds evidence of an e-government paradox in five forms: an emphasis on technological development; transactional services are faster but have displaced attention from core public services; petty corruption has been reduced but grand corruption remains; isomorphic mimicry; and greater participation by citizens has been limited. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the research is Kazakhstan. Applying the lessons learned to other post-Soviet countries has limitations given their different stages of development since independence. Practical implications: The key practical implication of this research is that countries can become absorbed by e-government technology without questioning the fundamental business model which underpins how public services are delivered. Ultimately, this impacts on the social value of e-government. Originality/value: While existing research has examined how e-government has been implemented in developing countries, this paper focusses on Kazakhstan as an authoritarian state with wider implications for post-Soviet countries.",
keywords = "E-government, Kazakhstan, Post-Soviet countries",
author = "Knox, {Colin Gerard} and Saltanat Janenova",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173",
language = "English",
journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Management",
issn = "0951-3558",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The e-government paradox in post-Soviet countries

AU - Knox, Colin Gerard

AU - Janenova, Saltanat

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the emergence of e-government in post-Soviet countries using Kazakhstan as a case study. Extant research on e-government in developing countries highlights significant benefits including improved public services, reduced corruption, and more open and inclusive government. The paper asserts the presence of an e-government paradox which limits its potential to improve public services. Design/methodology/approach: Primary data were collected from a number of sources: 6 focus groups with central government agencies, local authorities and civil society organisations; 25 structured and semi-structured interviews; and participant observation. Findings: The research finds evidence of an e-government paradox in five forms: an emphasis on technological development; transactional services are faster but have displaced attention from core public services; petty corruption has been reduced but grand corruption remains; isomorphic mimicry; and greater participation by citizens has been limited. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the research is Kazakhstan. Applying the lessons learned to other post-Soviet countries has limitations given their different stages of development since independence. Practical implications: The key practical implication of this research is that countries can become absorbed by e-government technology without questioning the fundamental business model which underpins how public services are delivered. Ultimately, this impacts on the social value of e-government. Originality/value: While existing research has examined how e-government has been implemented in developing countries, this paper focusses on Kazakhstan as an authoritarian state with wider implications for post-Soviet countries.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the emergence of e-government in post-Soviet countries using Kazakhstan as a case study. Extant research on e-government in developing countries highlights significant benefits including improved public services, reduced corruption, and more open and inclusive government. The paper asserts the presence of an e-government paradox which limits its potential to improve public services. Design/methodology/approach: Primary data were collected from a number of sources: 6 focus groups with central government agencies, local authorities and civil society organisations; 25 structured and semi-structured interviews; and participant observation. Findings: The research finds evidence of an e-government paradox in five forms: an emphasis on technological development; transactional services are faster but have displaced attention from core public services; petty corruption has been reduced but grand corruption remains; isomorphic mimicry; and greater participation by citizens has been limited. Research limitations/implications: The focus of the research is Kazakhstan. Applying the lessons learned to other post-Soviet countries has limitations given their different stages of development since independence. Practical implications: The key practical implication of this research is that countries can become absorbed by e-government technology without questioning the fundamental business model which underpins how public services are delivered. Ultimately, this impacts on the social value of e-government. Originality/value: While existing research has examined how e-government has been implemented in developing countries, this paper focusses on Kazakhstan as an authoritarian state with wider implications for post-Soviet countries.

KW - E-government

KW - Kazakhstan

KW - Post-Soviet countries

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065021313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065021313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173

DO - 10.1108/IJPSM-08-2018-0173

M3 - Article

JO - International Journal of Public Sector Management

JF - International Journal of Public Sector Management

SN - 0951-3558

ER -