The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma

H. Lee, A. G. Douglas-Jones, J. M. Morgan, B. Jasani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the effect of different fixation and processing regimens on the assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: The ER results for 420 patients from seven different hospitals in which antigen retrieval and IHC were performed centrally were compared. The intensity of ER positivity was assessed semiquantitatively using the Quick score (range 0-7). The scoring profiles of cases from each different source (hospital) were compared to detect differences in the proportion of cases that were negative (Quick score = 0), moderately positive (Quick score = 1-5), and strongly positive (Quick score = 6-7). Results: There were no significant differences (p = 0.3; χ2 test) in the proportion of cases in each category. Conclusions: None of the fixation or processing regimens had a significant adverse effect on the sensitivity of the ER assessment performed by automated immunohistochemistry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-238
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Clinical Pathology
Volume55
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Estrogen Receptors
Immunohistochemistry
Breast Neoplasms
Antigens

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. / Lee, H.; Douglas-Jones, A. G.; Morgan, J. M.; Jasani, B.

In: Journal of Clinical Pathology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 2002, p. 236-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lee, H. ; Douglas-Jones, A. G. ; Morgan, J. M. ; Jasani, B. / The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma. In: Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2002 ; Vol. 55, No. 3. pp. 236-238.
@article{4f917157b0a64edeb495ee586769664f,
title = "The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma",
abstract = "Aims: To investigate the effect of different fixation and processing regimens on the assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: The ER results for 420 patients from seven different hospitals in which antigen retrieval and IHC were performed centrally were compared. The intensity of ER positivity was assessed semiquantitatively using the Quick score (range 0-7). The scoring profiles of cases from each different source (hospital) were compared to detect differences in the proportion of cases that were negative (Quick score = 0), moderately positive (Quick score = 1-5), and strongly positive (Quick score = 6-7). Results: There were no significant differences (p = 0.3; χ2 test) in the proportion of cases in each category. Conclusions: None of the fixation or processing regimens had a significant adverse effect on the sensitivity of the ER assessment performed by automated immunohistochemistry.",
author = "H. Lee and Douglas-Jones, {A. G.} and Morgan, {J. M.} and B. Jasani",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "236--238",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Pathology - Clinical Molecular Pathology",
issn = "0021-9746",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of fixation and processing on the sensitivity of oestrogen receptor assay by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma

AU - Lee, H.

AU - Douglas-Jones, A. G.

AU - Morgan, J. M.

AU - Jasani, B.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Aims: To investigate the effect of different fixation and processing regimens on the assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: The ER results for 420 patients from seven different hospitals in which antigen retrieval and IHC were performed centrally were compared. The intensity of ER positivity was assessed semiquantitatively using the Quick score (range 0-7). The scoring profiles of cases from each different source (hospital) were compared to detect differences in the proportion of cases that were negative (Quick score = 0), moderately positive (Quick score = 1-5), and strongly positive (Quick score = 6-7). Results: There were no significant differences (p = 0.3; χ2 test) in the proportion of cases in each category. Conclusions: None of the fixation or processing regimens had a significant adverse effect on the sensitivity of the ER assessment performed by automated immunohistochemistry.

AB - Aims: To investigate the effect of different fixation and processing regimens on the assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods: The ER results for 420 patients from seven different hospitals in which antigen retrieval and IHC were performed centrally were compared. The intensity of ER positivity was assessed semiquantitatively using the Quick score (range 0-7). The scoring profiles of cases from each different source (hospital) were compared to detect differences in the proportion of cases that were negative (Quick score = 0), moderately positive (Quick score = 1-5), and strongly positive (Quick score = 6-7). Results: There were no significant differences (p = 0.3; χ2 test) in the proportion of cases in each category. Conclusions: None of the fixation or processing regimens had a significant adverse effect on the sensitivity of the ER assessment performed by automated immunohistochemistry.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036201456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036201456&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11896082

AN - SCOPUS:0036201456

VL - 55

SP - 236

EP - 238

JO - Journal of Clinical Pathology - Clinical Molecular Pathology

JF - Journal of Clinical Pathology - Clinical Molecular Pathology

SN - 0021-9746

IS - 3

ER -