The effects of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) in well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs

G. H. Montazeri, Z. Ziabakhsh, S. H. Tabatabaie, P. Pourafshari, M. Haghighi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The theoretical basis for the analysis of well test data presented in this study is the use of a pseudopressure function to linearize the flow of gas condensate in porous media. In this article different techniques to analyze gas condensate well tests using single-phase pseudopressure and two-phase pseudopressure are considered. The main objective of this work was to examine the available methods for well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs and investigate the effect of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) on these methods. Sensitivities of the two-phase pseudopressure methods and single-phase method are presented. However, at higher endpoint relative permeability, a lower prediction from single-phase pseudopressure analysis is obtained. A lower difference between p i and p dew causes larger condensate bank size and larger Region 2 and therefore better prediction of Raghavan's approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-461
Number of pages13
JournalPetroleum Science and Technology
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

dew
Gas condensates
gas condensate
well
Flow of gases
Porous materials
prediction
condensate
porous medium
permeability
test
rate
analysis
effect
method

Keywords

  • gas condensate reservoir
  • initial pressure difference (p - p )
  • production rate
  • single-phase pseudopressure
  • two-phase pseudopressure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Chemistry(all)
  • Chemical Engineering(all)
  • Fuel Technology
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

The effects of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) in well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs. / Montazeri, G. H.; Ziabakhsh, Z.; Tabatabaie, S. H.; Pourafshari, P.; Haghighi, M.

In: Petroleum Science and Technology, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.01.2011, p. 449-461.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2e73c2c63664325b89a42b6d230850e,
title = "The effects of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) in well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs",
abstract = "The theoretical basis for the analysis of well test data presented in this study is the use of a pseudopressure function to linearize the flow of gas condensate in porous media. In this article different techniques to analyze gas condensate well tests using single-phase pseudopressure and two-phase pseudopressure are considered. The main objective of this work was to examine the available methods for well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs and investigate the effect of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) on these methods. Sensitivities of the two-phase pseudopressure methods and single-phase method are presented. However, at higher endpoint relative permeability, a lower prediction from single-phase pseudopressure analysis is obtained. A lower difference between p i and p dew causes larger condensate bank size and larger Region 2 and therefore better prediction of Raghavan's approach.",
keywords = "gas condensate reservoir, initial pressure difference (p - p ), production rate, single-phase pseudopressure, two-phase pseudopressure",
author = "Montazeri, {G. H.} and Z. Ziabakhsh and Tabatabaie, {S. H.} and P. Pourafshari and M. Haghighi",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10916460902839255",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "449--461",
journal = "Petroleum Science and Technology",
issn = "1091-6466",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effects of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) in well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs

AU - Montazeri, G. H.

AU - Ziabakhsh, Z.

AU - Tabatabaie, S. H.

AU - Pourafshari, P.

AU - Haghighi, M.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The theoretical basis for the analysis of well test data presented in this study is the use of a pseudopressure function to linearize the flow of gas condensate in porous media. In this article different techniques to analyze gas condensate well tests using single-phase pseudopressure and two-phase pseudopressure are considered. The main objective of this work was to examine the available methods for well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs and investigate the effect of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) on these methods. Sensitivities of the two-phase pseudopressure methods and single-phase method are presented. However, at higher endpoint relative permeability, a lower prediction from single-phase pseudopressure analysis is obtained. A lower difference between p i and p dew causes larger condensate bank size and larger Region 2 and therefore better prediction of Raghavan's approach.

AB - The theoretical basis for the analysis of well test data presented in this study is the use of a pseudopressure function to linearize the flow of gas condensate in porous media. In this article different techniques to analyze gas condensate well tests using single-phase pseudopressure and two-phase pseudopressure are considered. The main objective of this work was to examine the available methods for well test analysis of gas condensate reservoirs and investigate the effect of production rate and initial pressure difference (p i - p dew ) on these methods. Sensitivities of the two-phase pseudopressure methods and single-phase method are presented. However, at higher endpoint relative permeability, a lower prediction from single-phase pseudopressure analysis is obtained. A lower difference between p i and p dew causes larger condensate bank size and larger Region 2 and therefore better prediction of Raghavan's approach.

KW - gas condensate reservoir

KW - initial pressure difference (p - p )

KW - production rate

KW - single-phase pseudopressure

KW - two-phase pseudopressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751498803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78751498803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10916460902839255

DO - 10.1080/10916460902839255

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 449

EP - 461

JO - Petroleum Science and Technology

JF - Petroleum Science and Technology

SN - 1091-6466

IS - 5

ER -