TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of standardized testing on education quality in Kyrgyzstan
T2 - The case of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006
AU - Shamatov, Duishon
AU - Sainazarov, Keneshbek
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In 2006, Kyrgyzstan entered the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) competition and the results were very poor, with it securing the last position among all participating countries. However, to date, there are no in-depth studies examining the results and the impact of the PISA test on the quality of secondary education in Kyrgyzstan. This chapter attempts to fill this gap. The study was conducted in post-Soviet Central Asian education context where standardized tests are only emerging and what their far-reaching implications are not yet known. The data were collected using semistructured interviews and document analysis. Respondents to semistructured interviews included representatives of government, education officials, specialists from the independent testing center, representatives of international development organizations, university professors, school administrators and teachers, community members, and students. The study showed that the poor results of PISA 2006 awakened many policymakers, education officials, and educators about the current state of the country's education. However, the findings of the study also showed that the lessons and implications were not analyzed systematically and, as a result, rather fragmented and less coordinated efforts and initiatives were undertaken.
AB - In 2006, Kyrgyzstan entered the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) competition and the results were very poor, with it securing the last position among all participating countries. However, to date, there are no in-depth studies examining the results and the impact of the PISA test on the quality of secondary education in Kyrgyzstan. This chapter attempts to fill this gap. The study was conducted in post-Soviet Central Asian education context where standardized tests are only emerging and what their far-reaching implications are not yet known. The data were collected using semistructured interviews and document analysis. Respondents to semistructured interviews included representatives of government, education officials, specialists from the independent testing center, representatives of international development organizations, university professors, school administrators and teachers, community members, and students. The study showed that the poor results of PISA 2006 awakened many policymakers, education officials, and educators about the current state of the country's education. However, the findings of the study also showed that the lessons and implications were not analyzed systematically and, as a result, rather fragmented and less coordinated efforts and initiatives were undertaken.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82455255410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82455255410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/S1479-3679(2010)0000013009
DO - 10.1108/S1479-3679(2010)0000013009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:82455255410
SN - 1479-3679
VL - 13
SP - 145
EP - 179
JO - International Perspectives on Education and Society
JF - International Perspectives on Education and Society
ER -