The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The state-centric focus of the mainstream regime theory did not allow
for inquiry into the activities of actors other than public authorities. It
was the global governance framework in the early 1990s that created
the possibility for analysis of private and voluntary regimes, such as
Corporate Social Responsibility (CRS) – a concept originating in the
management literature in the 1970s. This article engages in a critical
reading of the existing theoretical interpretations of CSR that can be
roughly divided into three groups: (i) pro-CSR integrative approach, (ii)
against the CSR neoliberal view, and (iii) critical perspective. It claims
that the tension that arises between these accounts stems from their conflictual
understanding of the role and position of the corporation within
society. The article challenges both the neoliberal account that dismisses
the necessity of CSR and the critical perspective that identifies CSR as a
Trojan horse aimed at preempting the possibility of a meaningful state
regulation. Instead, it takes on a constructivist mantle and argues that
CSR is a viable alternative to the traditional forms of regulation and
also recognizes the ability of NGOs to foster good corporate practices
through the stakeholder engagement strategy evident in the CSR regime.
In doing so, it uses insights from constructivist scholarship to present
the progressive possibilities immanent in the CSR regime.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch on Ethics and Social Responsibility
EditorsEduardo Simòes , José Neves
Place of PublicationLisbon
PublisherCenter for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE)
Pages133-147
ISBN (Print)978-989-732-030-9
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

social responsibility
regime
global governance
public authorities
non-governmental organization
corporation
stakeholder
regulation
interpretation
Corporate Social Responsibility
ability
Group

Keywords

  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Constructivism
  • global governance
  • business ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Business and International Management

Cite this

Savevska, M. (2012). The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility. In E. Simòes , & J. Neves (Eds.), Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility (pp. 133-147). Lisbon: Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE).

The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility. / Savevska, Maja.

Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility. ed. / Eduardo Simòes ; José Neves. Lisbon : Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE), 2012. p. 133-147.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Savevska, M 2012, The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility. in E Simòes & J Neves (eds), Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility. Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE), Lisbon, pp. 133-147.
Savevska M. The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility. In Simòes E, Neves J, editors, Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility. Lisbon: Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE). 2012. p. 133-147
Savevska, Maja. / The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility. Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility. editor / Eduardo Simòes ; José Neves. Lisbon : Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE), 2012. pp. 133-147
@inbook{5cd63c3b90dc4d6885ec7e0f98df676e,
title = "The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility",
abstract = "The state-centric focus of the mainstream regime theory did not allowfor inquiry into the activities of actors other than public authorities. Itwas the global governance framework in the early 1990s that createdthe possibility for analysis of private and voluntary regimes, such asCorporate Social Responsibility (CRS) – a concept originating in themanagement literature in the 1970s. This article engages in a criticalreading of the existing theoretical interpretations of CSR that can beroughly divided into three groups: (i) pro-CSR integrative approach, (ii)against the CSR neoliberal view, and (iii) critical perspective. It claimsthat the tension that arises between these accounts stems from their conflictualunderstanding of the role and position of the corporation withinsociety. The article challenges both the neoliberal account that dismissesthe necessity of CSR and the critical perspective that identifies CSR as aTrojan horse aimed at preempting the possibility of a meaningful stateregulation. Instead, it takes on a constructivist mantle and argues thatCSR is a viable alternative to the traditional forms of regulation andalso recognizes the ability of NGOs to foster good corporate practicesthrough the stakeholder engagement strategy evident in the CSR regime.In doing so, it uses insights from constructivist scholarship to presentthe progressive possibilities immanent in the CSR regime.",
keywords = "Corporate social responsibility, Constructivism, global governance, business ethics",
author = "Maja Savevska",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-989-732-030-9",
pages = "133--147",
editor = "{Sim{\`o}es }, Eduardo and Neves, {Jos{\'e} }",
booktitle = "Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility",
publisher = "Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE)",
address = "Portugal",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Progressive Possibilities Immanent in the Regime of Corporate Social Responsibility

AU - Savevska, Maja

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The state-centric focus of the mainstream regime theory did not allowfor inquiry into the activities of actors other than public authorities. Itwas the global governance framework in the early 1990s that createdthe possibility for analysis of private and voluntary regimes, such asCorporate Social Responsibility (CRS) – a concept originating in themanagement literature in the 1970s. This article engages in a criticalreading of the existing theoretical interpretations of CSR that can beroughly divided into three groups: (i) pro-CSR integrative approach, (ii)against the CSR neoliberal view, and (iii) critical perspective. It claimsthat the tension that arises between these accounts stems from their conflictualunderstanding of the role and position of the corporation withinsociety. The article challenges both the neoliberal account that dismissesthe necessity of CSR and the critical perspective that identifies CSR as aTrojan horse aimed at preempting the possibility of a meaningful stateregulation. Instead, it takes on a constructivist mantle and argues thatCSR is a viable alternative to the traditional forms of regulation andalso recognizes the ability of NGOs to foster good corporate practicesthrough the stakeholder engagement strategy evident in the CSR regime.In doing so, it uses insights from constructivist scholarship to presentthe progressive possibilities immanent in the CSR regime.

AB - The state-centric focus of the mainstream regime theory did not allowfor inquiry into the activities of actors other than public authorities. Itwas the global governance framework in the early 1990s that createdthe possibility for analysis of private and voluntary regimes, such asCorporate Social Responsibility (CRS) – a concept originating in themanagement literature in the 1970s. This article engages in a criticalreading of the existing theoretical interpretations of CSR that can beroughly divided into three groups: (i) pro-CSR integrative approach, (ii)against the CSR neoliberal view, and (iii) critical perspective. It claimsthat the tension that arises between these accounts stems from their conflictualunderstanding of the role and position of the corporation withinsociety. The article challenges both the neoliberal account that dismissesthe necessity of CSR and the critical perspective that identifies CSR as aTrojan horse aimed at preempting the possibility of a meaningful stateregulation. Instead, it takes on a constructivist mantle and argues thatCSR is a viable alternative to the traditional forms of regulation andalso recognizes the ability of NGOs to foster good corporate practicesthrough the stakeholder engagement strategy evident in the CSR regime.In doing so, it uses insights from constructivist scholarship to presentthe progressive possibilities immanent in the CSR regime.

KW - Corporate social responsibility

KW - Constructivism

KW - global governance

KW - business ethics

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-989-732-030-9

SP - 133

EP - 147

BT - Research on Ethics and Social Responsibility

A2 - Simòes , Eduardo

A2 - Neves, José

PB - Center for International Studies (CIS-IUL) of the Lisbon University Institute (ISCTE)

CY - Lisbon

ER -