The quality of democracy in Asia-Pacific

Issues and findings

Leonardo Morlino, Björn Dressel, Riccardo Pelizzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the comparative research we present here as the introduction to a set of case studies, we first assess the quality of democratic procedures, content and outcomes in eight countries in the Asia-Pacific region on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data. Second, we investigate whether, to what extent, and how democratic qualities relate to one another. These investigations are carried out by applying an analytical framework that we developed elsewhere. In contrast to our previous empirical findings demonstrating that all the qualities go hand in hand, that participation and competition are the main determinants of democratic qualities, and that the democratic qualities form a funnel of causality, the present study suggests a different set of conclusions. In the Asia-Pacific region, the democratic qualities are weakly related to one another, do not form a funnel of causality, and participation and competition are not the main drivers of democratic quality. The data presented in the empirical section of the paper claim the existence of an Asia-Pacific exceptionalism. By carefully examining the cases included in our sample, we provide a detailed explanation for why, at least as far as democratic qualities are concerned, the Asia-Pacific region may be exceptional and unique. We reach the conclusion that responsiveness could be achieved by a transition from a rule by law - often coupled with the prominence of patronage, patrimonialist practices and privileges for the elite - to a proper rule of law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-511
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Political Science Review
Volume32
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democracy
causality
participation
comparative research
clientelism
constitutional state
privilege
elite
driver
determinants
Law

Keywords

  • accountability
  • Asia
  • democracy
  • quality
  • rule of law

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

The quality of democracy in Asia-Pacific : Issues and findings. / Morlino, Leonardo; Dressel, Björn; Pelizzo, Riccardo.

In: International Political Science Review, Vol. 32, No. 5, 11.2011, p. 491-511.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morlino, Leonardo ; Dressel, Björn ; Pelizzo, Riccardo. / The quality of democracy in Asia-Pacific : Issues and findings. In: International Political Science Review. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 5. pp. 491-511.
@article{c680e0cf939c41c0afa3960f8c2aa698,
title = "The quality of democracy in Asia-Pacific: Issues and findings",
abstract = "In the comparative research we present here as the introduction to a set of case studies, we first assess the quality of democratic procedures, content and outcomes in eight countries in the Asia-Pacific region on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data. Second, we investigate whether, to what extent, and how democratic qualities relate to one another. These investigations are carried out by applying an analytical framework that we developed elsewhere. In contrast to our previous empirical findings demonstrating that all the qualities go hand in hand, that participation and competition are the main determinants of democratic qualities, and that the democratic qualities form a funnel of causality, the present study suggests a different set of conclusions. In the Asia-Pacific region, the democratic qualities are weakly related to one another, do not form a funnel of causality, and participation and competition are not the main drivers of democratic quality. The data presented in the empirical section of the paper claim the existence of an Asia-Pacific exceptionalism. By carefully examining the cases included in our sample, we provide a detailed explanation for why, at least as far as democratic qualities are concerned, the Asia-Pacific region may be exceptional and unique. We reach the conclusion that responsiveness could be achieved by a transition from a rule by law - often coupled with the prominence of patronage, patrimonialist practices and privileges for the elite - to a proper rule of law.",
keywords = "accountability, Asia, democracy, quality, rule of law",
author = "Leonardo Morlino and Bj{\"o}rn Dressel and Riccardo Pelizzo",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/0192512111418334",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "491--511",
journal = "International Political Science Review",
issn = "0192-5121",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The quality of democracy in Asia-Pacific

T2 - Issues and findings

AU - Morlino, Leonardo

AU - Dressel, Björn

AU - Pelizzo, Riccardo

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - In the comparative research we present here as the introduction to a set of case studies, we first assess the quality of democratic procedures, content and outcomes in eight countries in the Asia-Pacific region on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data. Second, we investigate whether, to what extent, and how democratic qualities relate to one another. These investigations are carried out by applying an analytical framework that we developed elsewhere. In contrast to our previous empirical findings demonstrating that all the qualities go hand in hand, that participation and competition are the main determinants of democratic qualities, and that the democratic qualities form a funnel of causality, the present study suggests a different set of conclusions. In the Asia-Pacific region, the democratic qualities are weakly related to one another, do not form a funnel of causality, and participation and competition are not the main drivers of democratic quality. The data presented in the empirical section of the paper claim the existence of an Asia-Pacific exceptionalism. By carefully examining the cases included in our sample, we provide a detailed explanation for why, at least as far as democratic qualities are concerned, the Asia-Pacific region may be exceptional and unique. We reach the conclusion that responsiveness could be achieved by a transition from a rule by law - often coupled with the prominence of patronage, patrimonialist practices and privileges for the elite - to a proper rule of law.

AB - In the comparative research we present here as the introduction to a set of case studies, we first assess the quality of democratic procedures, content and outcomes in eight countries in the Asia-Pacific region on the basis of quantitative and qualitative data. Second, we investigate whether, to what extent, and how democratic qualities relate to one another. These investigations are carried out by applying an analytical framework that we developed elsewhere. In contrast to our previous empirical findings demonstrating that all the qualities go hand in hand, that participation and competition are the main determinants of democratic qualities, and that the democratic qualities form a funnel of causality, the present study suggests a different set of conclusions. In the Asia-Pacific region, the democratic qualities are weakly related to one another, do not form a funnel of causality, and participation and competition are not the main drivers of democratic quality. The data presented in the empirical section of the paper claim the existence of an Asia-Pacific exceptionalism. By carefully examining the cases included in our sample, we provide a detailed explanation for why, at least as far as democratic qualities are concerned, the Asia-Pacific region may be exceptional and unique. We reach the conclusion that responsiveness could be achieved by a transition from a rule by law - often coupled with the prominence of patronage, patrimonialist practices and privileges for the elite - to a proper rule of law.

KW - accountability

KW - Asia

KW - democracy

KW - quality

KW - rule of law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82555194448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82555194448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0192512111418334

DO - 10.1177/0192512111418334

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 491

EP - 511

JO - International Political Science Review

JF - International Political Science Review

SN - 0192-5121

IS - 5

ER -