The regional dimension of education hubs

Leading and brokering geopolitics

Jack T. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Several education hubs have emerged in the last decade in Asia and the Middle East. These ambitious policy initiatives share a common interest in cross-border higher education even though diverse rationales underpin their development. While some claim to be an international education hub, others claim to be a regional education hub or simultaneously international and regional. Considerable rhetoric and assumptions of uniformity exist in the discourse of education hub development. This paper clarifies the regional dimension of education hubs in terms of concepts, rationales, and strategies of regional engagement. Policymakers pursue different definitions of region as they leverage higher education to gain geopolitical influence in targeted spheres. Furthermore, the distinction between the role of a regional leader and regional broker presents different opportunities for an education hub. The paper compares the development of three key education hubs in Asia: Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-89
Number of pages21
JournalHigher Education Policy
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

geopolitics
education
international leading power
Middle East
Singapore
Malaysia
Hong Kong
rhetoric
discourse

Keywords

  • Cross-border education
  • Education hub
  • Geopolitics
  • Internationalization
  • Regional
  • Soft power

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The regional dimension of education hubs : Leading and brokering geopolitics. / Lee, Jack T.

In: Higher Education Policy, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 69-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{29a453d9977846a9803df34879ee260f,
title = "The regional dimension of education hubs: Leading and brokering geopolitics",
abstract = "Several education hubs have emerged in the last decade in Asia and the Middle East. These ambitious policy initiatives share a common interest in cross-border higher education even though diverse rationales underpin their development. While some claim to be an international education hub, others claim to be a regional education hub or simultaneously international and regional. Considerable rhetoric and assumptions of uniformity exist in the discourse of education hub development. This paper clarifies the regional dimension of education hubs in terms of concepts, rationales, and strategies of regional engagement. Policymakers pursue different definitions of region as they leverage higher education to gain geopolitical influence in targeted spheres. Furthermore, the distinction between the role of a regional leader and regional broker presents different opportunities for an education hub. The paper compares the development of three key education hubs in Asia: Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.",
keywords = "Cross-border education, Education hub, Geopolitics, Internationalization, Regional, Soft power",
author = "Lee, {Jack T.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1057/hep.2014.32",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "69--89",
journal = "Higher Education Policy",
issn = "0952-8733",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The regional dimension of education hubs

T2 - Leading and brokering geopolitics

AU - Lee, Jack T.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Several education hubs have emerged in the last decade in Asia and the Middle East. These ambitious policy initiatives share a common interest in cross-border higher education even though diverse rationales underpin their development. While some claim to be an international education hub, others claim to be a regional education hub or simultaneously international and regional. Considerable rhetoric and assumptions of uniformity exist in the discourse of education hub development. This paper clarifies the regional dimension of education hubs in terms of concepts, rationales, and strategies of regional engagement. Policymakers pursue different definitions of region as they leverage higher education to gain geopolitical influence in targeted spheres. Furthermore, the distinction between the role of a regional leader and regional broker presents different opportunities for an education hub. The paper compares the development of three key education hubs in Asia: Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

AB - Several education hubs have emerged in the last decade in Asia and the Middle East. These ambitious policy initiatives share a common interest in cross-border higher education even though diverse rationales underpin their development. While some claim to be an international education hub, others claim to be a regional education hub or simultaneously international and regional. Considerable rhetoric and assumptions of uniformity exist in the discourse of education hub development. This paper clarifies the regional dimension of education hubs in terms of concepts, rationales, and strategies of regional engagement. Policymakers pursue different definitions of region as they leverage higher education to gain geopolitical influence in targeted spheres. Furthermore, the distinction between the role of a regional leader and regional broker presents different opportunities for an education hub. The paper compares the development of three key education hubs in Asia: Malaysia, Singapore, and Hong Kong.

KW - Cross-border education

KW - Education hub

KW - Geopolitics

KW - Internationalization

KW - Regional

KW - Soft power

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938511139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938511139&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/hep.2014.32

DO - 10.1057/hep.2014.32

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 69

EP - 89

JO - Higher Education Policy

JF - Higher Education Policy

SN - 0952-8733

IS - 1

ER -