The Science to Save Us from Philosophy of Science

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

I defend the view that science is not primarily concerned with knowledge and that its method of arriving at proposing hypotheses does not commit us to have stable beliefs about them. Instead, what drives discovery is ignorance that scientists can cleverly exploit, brought to the fore by retroductive inferences. Recent discoveries in sciences that cope with under-structured problem spaces testify its prevalence, and puts paid to epistemic justification of retroduction. I argue that catering well for the right conditions in which to cultivate such ignorance is a key to how uberous retroductive inferences can arise.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)149--166
JournalAxiomathes
Volume25
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Philosophy of Science
Justification
Ignorance
Inference
Knowledge
Beliefs
Epistemic Justification

Cite this

The Science to Save Us from Philosophy of Science. / Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko.

In: Axiomathes, Vol. 25, 2015, p. 149--166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{509a73e24cf34cd9b9ceb62241cb1bcb,
title = "The Science to Save Us from Philosophy of Science",
abstract = "I defend the view that science is not primarily concerned with knowledge and that its method of arriving at proposing hypotheses does not commit us to have stable beliefs about them. Instead, what drives discovery is ignorance that scientists can cleverly exploit, brought to the fore by retroductive inferences. Recent discoveries in sciences that cope with under-structured problem spaces testify its prevalence, and puts paid to epistemic justification of retroduction. I argue that catering well for the right conditions in which to cultivate such ignorance is a key to how uberous retroductive inferences can arise.",
author = "Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "149----166",
journal = "Axiomathes",
issn = "1122-1151",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Science to Save Us from Philosophy of Science

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - I defend the view that science is not primarily concerned with knowledge and that its method of arriving at proposing hypotheses does not commit us to have stable beliefs about them. Instead, what drives discovery is ignorance that scientists can cleverly exploit, brought to the fore by retroductive inferences. Recent discoveries in sciences that cope with under-structured problem spaces testify its prevalence, and puts paid to epistemic justification of retroduction. I argue that catering well for the right conditions in which to cultivate such ignorance is a key to how uberous retroductive inferences can arise.

AB - I defend the view that science is not primarily concerned with knowledge and that its method of arriving at proposing hypotheses does not commit us to have stable beliefs about them. Instead, what drives discovery is ignorance that scientists can cleverly exploit, brought to the fore by retroductive inferences. Recent discoveries in sciences that cope with under-structured problem spaces testify its prevalence, and puts paid to epistemic justification of retroduction. I argue that catering well for the right conditions in which to cultivate such ignorance is a key to how uberous retroductive inferences can arise.

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 149

EP - 166

JO - Axiomathes

JF - Axiomathes

SN - 1122-1151

ER -