Theory-building in political marketing: Parallels in public management

Patrick Butler, Neil Collins, Martin R. Fellenz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Political Marketing shares significant common ground with Public Sector Marketing, but this is not reflected in the current literature. These subdisciplines are developing in mutual isolation, thereby limiting their relevance and theoretical potential. The political marketing research literature highlights election campaigns and communications processes, even though marketing for most politicians involves being associated with actual public service delivery. The public sector marketing literature is both fragmented and heavily influenced by New Public Management which explicitly seeks to disconnect administration from politics, even though public sector managers are essential to political processes and not constrained only to the implementation of policy. The separation of these developing fields is influenced in part by the distinctive US experience of politics and administration; but that experience is untypical of other contexts and thus inclined to skew understanding and theory development. The welfare effects of marketing activity in the politics and public administration contexts are profound; an approach supportive of subdiscipline integration and development is critical.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-107
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Political Marketing
Volume6
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 8 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public management
marketing
public sector
politics
election campaign
New Public Management
development theory
public administration
public service
Political marketing
Theory building
Public management
Marketing
Public sector
politician
social isolation
communications
experience
welfare
manager

Keywords

  • Political marketing
  • Public sector marketing
  • Subdiscipline integration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Theory-building in political marketing : Parallels in public management. / Butler, Patrick; Collins, Neil; Fellenz, Martin R.

In: Journal of Political Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 2-3, 08.08.2007, p. 91-107.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Butler, Patrick ; Collins, Neil ; Fellenz, Martin R. / Theory-building in political marketing : Parallels in public management. In: Journal of Political Marketing. 2007 ; Vol. 6, No. 2-3. pp. 91-107.
@article{81d57c9196af45d8af9a64647c5062f9,
title = "Theory-building in political marketing: Parallels in public management",
abstract = "Political Marketing shares significant common ground with Public Sector Marketing, but this is not reflected in the current literature. These subdisciplines are developing in mutual isolation, thereby limiting their relevance and theoretical potential. The political marketing research literature highlights election campaigns and communications processes, even though marketing for most politicians involves being associated with actual public service delivery. The public sector marketing literature is both fragmented and heavily influenced by New Public Management which explicitly seeks to disconnect administration from politics, even though public sector managers are essential to political processes and not constrained only to the implementation of policy. The separation of these developing fields is influenced in part by the distinctive US experience of politics and administration; but that experience is untypical of other contexts and thus inclined to skew understanding and theory development. The welfare effects of marketing activity in the politics and public administration contexts are profound; an approach supportive of subdiscipline integration and development is critical.",
keywords = "Political marketing, Public sector marketing, Subdiscipline integration",
author = "Patrick Butler and Neil Collins and Fellenz, {Martin R.}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1300/J199v06n02_06",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "91--107",
journal = "Journal of Political Marketing",
issn = "1537-7857",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2-3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory-building in political marketing

T2 - Parallels in public management

AU - Butler, Patrick

AU - Collins, Neil

AU - Fellenz, Martin R.

PY - 2007/8/8

Y1 - 2007/8/8

N2 - Political Marketing shares significant common ground with Public Sector Marketing, but this is not reflected in the current literature. These subdisciplines are developing in mutual isolation, thereby limiting their relevance and theoretical potential. The political marketing research literature highlights election campaigns and communications processes, even though marketing for most politicians involves being associated with actual public service delivery. The public sector marketing literature is both fragmented and heavily influenced by New Public Management which explicitly seeks to disconnect administration from politics, even though public sector managers are essential to political processes and not constrained only to the implementation of policy. The separation of these developing fields is influenced in part by the distinctive US experience of politics and administration; but that experience is untypical of other contexts and thus inclined to skew understanding and theory development. The welfare effects of marketing activity in the politics and public administration contexts are profound; an approach supportive of subdiscipline integration and development is critical.

AB - Political Marketing shares significant common ground with Public Sector Marketing, but this is not reflected in the current literature. These subdisciplines are developing in mutual isolation, thereby limiting their relevance and theoretical potential. The political marketing research literature highlights election campaigns and communications processes, even though marketing for most politicians involves being associated with actual public service delivery. The public sector marketing literature is both fragmented and heavily influenced by New Public Management which explicitly seeks to disconnect administration from politics, even though public sector managers are essential to political processes and not constrained only to the implementation of policy. The separation of these developing fields is influenced in part by the distinctive US experience of politics and administration; but that experience is untypical of other contexts and thus inclined to skew understanding and theory development. The welfare effects of marketing activity in the politics and public administration contexts are profound; an approach supportive of subdiscipline integration and development is critical.

KW - Political marketing

KW - Public sector marketing

KW - Subdiscipline integration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548479948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548479948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J199v06n02_06

DO - 10.1300/J199v06n02_06

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548479948

VL - 6

SP - 91

EP - 107

JO - Journal of Political Marketing

JF - Journal of Political Marketing

SN - 1537-7857

IS - 2-3

ER -