Transaxillary gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Kristijonas Jasaitis, Anna Midlenko, Aigerim Bekenova, Povilas Ignatavicius, Antanas Gulbinas, Albertas Dauksa

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates surgical outcome and safety results of conventional (OT) versus endoscopic transaxillary gasless thyroidectomies (ET). Material and methods: A systematic literature search was performed. The weighted mean differences or the odd ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were examined for surgical outcomes and complications. The results were analysed using fixed- or random-effects models. The heterogeneity was checked by the Cochran Q test and the extent of inconsistency was evaluated by the I2 statistic. Results: Ten studies and 1597 patients were included. All studies found that ET required longer operative time. Postoperative pain was significantly lower after ET on day 1 and day 7. No statistical difference was found in complication rates. Conclusions: ET has disadvantages such as longer surgery time, but it is a feasible and safe procedure with lower postoperative pain and comparable complication rates to OT. However, good quality prospective randomised studies are necessary to draw firmer conclusions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)482-490
Number of pages9
JournalWideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Conventional
  • Endoscopic
  • Gasless
  • Meta-analysis
  • Thyroidectomy
  • Transaxillary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Obstetrics and Gynaecology
  • Urology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transaxillary gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this