Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs

Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Francesco Bellucci

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two dominant ideas have prevailed in the recent research on diagrammatic reasoning and representation. That diagrams, especially logical diagrams, are visual in senses in which symbolic notations are not, and that logical diagrams are iconic in senses in which symbolic notations are not. We submit both of these claims under critical scrutiny. We use Peirce's theory of Existential Graphs, the mainstay of diagrammatic reasoning in both its historical and systematical senses, as the testing ground. We show that neither of these claims is well founded.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPeirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic
PublisherRoutledge
Pages174--195
ISBN (Print)978-1138215016
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Existential Graphs
Dogma
Diagrams
Diagrammatic Reasoning
Logic
Notation
Iconic
Scrutiny
Testing

Cite this

Pietarinen, A-V., & Bellucci, F. (2017). Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs. In Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic (pp. 174--195). Routledge.

Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs. / Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko; Bellucci, Francesco.

Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic. Routledge, 2017. p. 174--195.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)

Pietarinen, A-V & Bellucci, F 2017, Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs. in Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic. Routledge, pp. 174--195.
Pietarinen A-V, Bellucci F. Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs. In Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic. Routledge. 2017. p. 174--195
Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko ; Bellucci, Francesco. / Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs. Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic. Routledge, 2017. pp. 174--195
@inbook{0d8b2cd9b7cc4702a51b8fde08b3d78f,
title = "Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs",
abstract = "Two dominant ideas have prevailed in the recent research on diagrammatic reasoning and representation. That diagrams, especially logical diagrams, are visual in senses in which symbolic notations are not, and that logical diagrams are iconic in senses in which symbolic notations are not. We submit both of these claims under critical scrutiny. We use Peirce's theory of Existential Graphs, the mainstay of diagrammatic reasoning in both its historical and systematical senses, as the testing ground. We show that neither of these claims is well founded.",
author = "Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen and Francesco Bellucci",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1138215016",
pages = "174----195",
booktitle = "Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Two Dogmas of Diagrammatic Reasoning: A View from Existential Graphs

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko

AU - Bellucci, Francesco

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Two dominant ideas have prevailed in the recent research on diagrammatic reasoning and representation. That diagrams, especially logical diagrams, are visual in senses in which symbolic notations are not, and that logical diagrams are iconic in senses in which symbolic notations are not. We submit both of these claims under critical scrutiny. We use Peirce's theory of Existential Graphs, the mainstay of diagrammatic reasoning in both its historical and systematical senses, as the testing ground. We show that neither of these claims is well founded.

AB - Two dominant ideas have prevailed in the recent research on diagrammatic reasoning and representation. That diagrams, especially logical diagrams, are visual in senses in which symbolic notations are not, and that logical diagrams are iconic in senses in which symbolic notations are not. We submit both of these claims under critical scrutiny. We use Peirce's theory of Existential Graphs, the mainstay of diagrammatic reasoning in both its historical and systematical senses, as the testing ground. We show that neither of these claims is well founded.

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 978-1138215016

SP - 174

EP - 195

BT - Peirce on Perception and Reasoning: From Icons to Logic

PB - Routledge

ER -