找魚

後現代社會科學研究倫理試論

Translated title of the contribution: Undecided Mencius: Opening up Ontology for the Responsibility of Choice

Chih-yu Shih, Hung-Jen Wang, Wei-Hsia Li, Shu-Shan Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Contrary to the mainstream epistemology of social science, this paper argues that the mission of social science is more than explaining. It treats behavior as product of both situation and mind that is always undecidable until it happens. Accordingly, the mission of social science is to discover those other behavioral possibilities that could have occurred but did not. These possibilities are often explained away in theory-driven research, as if external, objective structures close them off. As a result, the actors under study are left without responsibility, to the extent that anyone in the same shoes would act in the same way. This paper borrows Mencius's analogy of himself deciding between a fish and bear's paws and eventually favoring the paws. The paper contends that Mencius did not really favor the paws. Based on this assumption, it is epistemologically imperative to discover the fish, which disappeared in Mencius's decision. It is the fish that made Mencius's choice of the paws a genuine choice, and Mencius, a real person.
Original languageChinese
Pages (from-to)79-102
Number of pages24
JournalTaiwanese Journal of Political Science
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Mencius
Ontology
Responsibility
Social Sciences
Fish
Person
Shoes
Epistemology

Keywords

  • epistemology ; ontology ; alterity ; violence

Cite this

找魚 : 後現代社會科學研究倫理試論. / Shih, Chih-yu; Wang, Hung-Jen; Li, Wei-Hsia ; Lee, Shu-Shan.

In: Taiwanese Journal of Political Science, Vol. 20, 2004, p. 79-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shih, Chih-yu ; Wang, Hung-Jen ; Li, Wei-Hsia ; Lee, Shu-Shan. / 找魚 : 後現代社會科學研究倫理試論. In: Taiwanese Journal of Political Science. 2004 ; Vol. 20. pp. 79-102.
@article{dddc3d8e40924fcb85dee1c74dceb49a,
title = "找魚: 後現代社會科學研究倫理試論",
abstract = "Contrary to the mainstream epistemology of social science, this paper argues that the mission of social science is more than explaining. It treats behavior as product of both situation and mind that is always undecidable until it happens. Accordingly, the mission of social science is to discover those other behavioral possibilities that could have occurred but did not. These possibilities are often explained away in theory-driven research, as if external, objective structures close them off. As a result, the actors under study are left without responsibility, to the extent that anyone in the same shoes would act in the same way. This paper borrows Mencius's analogy of himself deciding between a fish and bear's paws and eventually favoring the paws. The paper contends that Mencius did not really favor the paws. Based on this assumption, it is epistemologically imperative to discover the fish, which disappeared in Mencius's decision. It is the fish that made Mencius's choice of the paws a genuine choice, and Mencius, a real person.",
keywords = "epistemology ; ontology ; alterity ; violence",
author = "Chih-yu Shih and Hung-Jen Wang and Wei-Hsia Li and Shu-Shan Lee",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.6166/TJPS",
language = "Chinese",
volume = "20",
pages = "79--102",
journal = "Taiwanese Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1018-3892",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - 找魚

T2 - 後現代社會科學研究倫理試論

AU - Shih, Chih-yu

AU - Wang, Hung-Jen

AU - Li, Wei-Hsia

AU - Lee, Shu-Shan

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Contrary to the mainstream epistemology of social science, this paper argues that the mission of social science is more than explaining. It treats behavior as product of both situation and mind that is always undecidable until it happens. Accordingly, the mission of social science is to discover those other behavioral possibilities that could have occurred but did not. These possibilities are often explained away in theory-driven research, as if external, objective structures close them off. As a result, the actors under study are left without responsibility, to the extent that anyone in the same shoes would act in the same way. This paper borrows Mencius's analogy of himself deciding between a fish and bear's paws and eventually favoring the paws. The paper contends that Mencius did not really favor the paws. Based on this assumption, it is epistemologically imperative to discover the fish, which disappeared in Mencius's decision. It is the fish that made Mencius's choice of the paws a genuine choice, and Mencius, a real person.

AB - Contrary to the mainstream epistemology of social science, this paper argues that the mission of social science is more than explaining. It treats behavior as product of both situation and mind that is always undecidable until it happens. Accordingly, the mission of social science is to discover those other behavioral possibilities that could have occurred but did not. These possibilities are often explained away in theory-driven research, as if external, objective structures close them off. As a result, the actors under study are left without responsibility, to the extent that anyone in the same shoes would act in the same way. This paper borrows Mencius's analogy of himself deciding between a fish and bear's paws and eventually favoring the paws. The paper contends that Mencius did not really favor the paws. Based on this assumption, it is epistemologically imperative to discover the fish, which disappeared in Mencius's decision. It is the fish that made Mencius's choice of the paws a genuine choice, and Mencius, a real person.

KW - epistemology ; ontology ; alterity ; violence

U2 - 10.6166/TJPS

DO - 10.6166/TJPS

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 79

EP - 102

JO - Taiwanese Journal of Political Science

JF - Taiwanese Journal of Political Science

SN - 1018-3892

ER -