Understanding economic justice attitudes in two countries

Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

Azamat K. Junisbai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Analyzing data from the 2007 Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Inequality Survey, I identify and compare the determinants of economic justice attitudes in two formerly similar majority-Muslim nations that are now distinguished almost exclusively by their dissimilar economic circumstances following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In Kazakhstan, where the economy is growing rapidly, the important factors predicting economic egalitarianism are connected to people's perceived ability to do well in the future. In contrast, in Kyrgyzstan, which has stagnated in the post-Soviet era, people's immediate economic vulnerability predicts egalitarianism, while their economic prospects are irrelevant. Finally, the effect of several factors on support for egalitarianism appears impervious to the prevailing economic winds: religious orthodoxy, the urban vs. rural divide, and membership in a historically privileged ethnic group. These patterns reflect both the commonalities in the two countries' histories, demography, and religion and their divergent economic trajectories since the collapse of the USSR.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1677-1702
Number of pages26
JournalSocial Forces
Volume88
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Kyrgyzstan
Kazakhstan
justice
egalitarianism
economics
USSR
demography
economic factors
Economic Justice
Economics
Muslim
ethnic group
vulnerability
Religion
determinants
economy
ability
history
Egalitarianism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • History
  • Anthropology

Cite this

Understanding economic justice attitudes in two countries : Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. / Junisbai, Azamat K.

In: Social Forces, Vol. 88, No. 4, 06.2010, p. 1677-1702.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Junisbai, Azamat K. / Understanding economic justice attitudes in two countries : Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. In: Social Forces. 2010 ; Vol. 88, No. 4. pp. 1677-1702.
@article{d76a2323c43840389308c625a44e455b,
title = "Understanding economic justice attitudes in two countries: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan",
abstract = "Analyzing data from the 2007 Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Inequality Survey, I identify and compare the determinants of economic justice attitudes in two formerly similar majority-Muslim nations that are now distinguished almost exclusively by their dissimilar economic circumstances following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In Kazakhstan, where the economy is growing rapidly, the important factors predicting economic egalitarianism are connected to people's perceived ability to do well in the future. In contrast, in Kyrgyzstan, which has stagnated in the post-Soviet era, people's immediate economic vulnerability predicts egalitarianism, while their economic prospects are irrelevant. Finally, the effect of several factors on support for egalitarianism appears impervious to the prevailing economic winds: religious orthodoxy, the urban vs. rural divide, and membership in a historically privileged ethnic group. These patterns reflect both the commonalities in the two countries' histories, demography, and religion and their divergent economic trajectories since the collapse of the USSR.",
author = "Junisbai, {Azamat K.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1353/sof.2010.0024",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
pages = "1677--1702",
journal = "Social Forces",
issn = "0037-7732",
publisher = "University of North Carolina Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding economic justice attitudes in two countries

T2 - Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan

AU - Junisbai, Azamat K.

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Analyzing data from the 2007 Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Inequality Survey, I identify and compare the determinants of economic justice attitudes in two formerly similar majority-Muslim nations that are now distinguished almost exclusively by their dissimilar economic circumstances following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In Kazakhstan, where the economy is growing rapidly, the important factors predicting economic egalitarianism are connected to people's perceived ability to do well in the future. In contrast, in Kyrgyzstan, which has stagnated in the post-Soviet era, people's immediate economic vulnerability predicts egalitarianism, while their economic prospects are irrelevant. Finally, the effect of several factors on support for egalitarianism appears impervious to the prevailing economic winds: religious orthodoxy, the urban vs. rural divide, and membership in a historically privileged ethnic group. These patterns reflect both the commonalities in the two countries' histories, demography, and religion and their divergent economic trajectories since the collapse of the USSR.

AB - Analyzing data from the 2007 Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Inequality Survey, I identify and compare the determinants of economic justice attitudes in two formerly similar majority-Muslim nations that are now distinguished almost exclusively by their dissimilar economic circumstances following the collapse of the Soviet Union. In Kazakhstan, where the economy is growing rapidly, the important factors predicting economic egalitarianism are connected to people's perceived ability to do well in the future. In contrast, in Kyrgyzstan, which has stagnated in the post-Soviet era, people's immediate economic vulnerability predicts egalitarianism, while their economic prospects are irrelevant. Finally, the effect of several factors on support for egalitarianism appears impervious to the prevailing economic winds: religious orthodoxy, the urban vs. rural divide, and membership in a historically privileged ethnic group. These patterns reflect both the commonalities in the two countries' histories, demography, and religion and their divergent economic trajectories since the collapse of the USSR.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049251907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78049251907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/sof.2010.0024

DO - 10.1353/sof.2010.0024

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 1677

EP - 1702

JO - Social Forces

JF - Social Forces

SN - 0037-7732

IS - 4

ER -