TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding human participant research ethics
T2 - The perspectives of social scientists in Central Asia
AU - Sagitova, Roza
AU - Ramazanova, Markhabat
AU - Sharplin, Elaine
AU - Berekeyeva, Aipara
AU - Parmenter, Lynne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Central Asian (CA) countries have been actively developing their research and knowledge production systems. However, inconsistent alignment with international research ethics norms creates challenges for researchers in CA to equally participate in global knowledge production. Based on quantitative survey responses of 296 social science researchers from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan, this paper explores social scientists’ understandings of international principles and practices of human participant research ethics. The findings show that CA social science researchers focus on a broad understanding of research integrity, focused on academic and professional integrity. The respondents highlighted the importance of individual researcher values such as honesty, responsibility, and respectfulness. With only 35 % of the respondents reporting the existence of a research ethics committee (REC) at their institutions, most respondents believe that human participant research ethics are an individual rather than an institutional responsibility in Central Asia. This study has implications for developing research and policy in other post-Soviet and emerging research contexts.
AB - Central Asian (CA) countries have been actively developing their research and knowledge production systems. However, inconsistent alignment with international research ethics norms creates challenges for researchers in CA to equally participate in global knowledge production. Based on quantitative survey responses of 296 social science researchers from Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan, this paper explores social scientists’ understandings of international principles and practices of human participant research ethics. The findings show that CA social science researchers focus on a broad understanding of research integrity, focused on academic and professional integrity. The respondents highlighted the importance of individual researcher values such as honesty, responsibility, and respectfulness. With only 35 % of the respondents reporting the existence of a research ethics committee (REC) at their institutions, most respondents believe that human participant research ethics are an individual rather than an institutional responsibility in Central Asia. This study has implications for developing research and policy in other post-Soviet and emerging research contexts.
KW - Central Asia
KW - Ethics
KW - Human participant research ethics
KW - Research ethics committees
KW - social sciences
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85181693812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85181693812&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102303
DO - 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102303
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85181693812
SN - 0883-0355
VL - 124
JO - International Journal of Educational Research
JF - International Journal of Educational Research
M1 - 102303
ER -