Voting for justices

Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010

Charles M. Cameron, Jonathan P. Kastellec, Jee Kwang Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The contentiousness of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations increased dramatically from 1937 to 2010. We identify four potential sources of the increase: (1) changes in the Senate; (2) changes in the nominees; (3) changes in the political environment; and, (4) changes in senators' evaluative criteria. Using new data and improved statistical techniques, we estimate a well-performing model of senators' individual voting choices on Supreme Court nominees. Simulations allow an evaluation of the contribution of the four classes of factors to increased contentiousness. The principal source of increased contentiousness was the combination of increasingly extreme nominees and an increasingly polarized Senate. Also significant was the increased mobilization of interest groups. In sum, increased contentiousness seems largely to reflect the ideological polarization of American political elites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-299
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume75
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

senate
voting
continuity
justice
Supreme Court
political elite
interest group
polarization
mobilization
simulation
evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Voting for justices : Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010. / Cameron, Charles M.; Kastellec, Jonathan P.; Park, Jee Kwang.

In: Journal of Politics, Vol. 75, No. 2, 04.2013, p. 283-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cameron, Charles M. ; Kastellec, Jonathan P. ; Park, Jee Kwang. / Voting for justices : Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010. In: Journal of Politics. 2013 ; Vol. 75, No. 2. pp. 283-299.
@article{cc4c117a412c4b78a3eb70027a6daa24,
title = "Voting for justices: Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010",
abstract = "The contentiousness of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations increased dramatically from 1937 to 2010. We identify four potential sources of the increase: (1) changes in the Senate; (2) changes in the nominees; (3) changes in the political environment; and, (4) changes in senators' evaluative criteria. Using new data and improved statistical techniques, we estimate a well-performing model of senators' individual voting choices on Supreme Court nominees. Simulations allow an evaluation of the contribution of the four classes of factors to increased contentiousness. The principal source of increased contentiousness was the combination of increasingly extreme nominees and an increasingly polarized Senate. Also significant was the increased mobilization of interest groups. In sum, increased contentiousness seems largely to reflect the ideological polarization of American political elites.",
author = "Cameron, {Charles M.} and Kastellec, {Jonathan P.} and Park, {Jee Kwang}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1017/S0022381613000017",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "283--299",
journal = "Journal of Politics",
issn = "0022-3816",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Voting for justices

T2 - Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010

AU - Cameron, Charles M.

AU - Kastellec, Jonathan P.

AU - Park, Jee Kwang

PY - 2013/4

Y1 - 2013/4

N2 - The contentiousness of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations increased dramatically from 1937 to 2010. We identify four potential sources of the increase: (1) changes in the Senate; (2) changes in the nominees; (3) changes in the political environment; and, (4) changes in senators' evaluative criteria. Using new data and improved statistical techniques, we estimate a well-performing model of senators' individual voting choices on Supreme Court nominees. Simulations allow an evaluation of the contribution of the four classes of factors to increased contentiousness. The principal source of increased contentiousness was the combination of increasingly extreme nominees and an increasingly polarized Senate. Also significant was the increased mobilization of interest groups. In sum, increased contentiousness seems largely to reflect the ideological polarization of American political elites.

AB - The contentiousness of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations increased dramatically from 1937 to 2010. We identify four potential sources of the increase: (1) changes in the Senate; (2) changes in the nominees; (3) changes in the political environment; and, (4) changes in senators' evaluative criteria. Using new data and improved statistical techniques, we estimate a well-performing model of senators' individual voting choices on Supreme Court nominees. Simulations allow an evaluation of the contribution of the four classes of factors to increased contentiousness. The principal source of increased contentiousness was the combination of increasingly extreme nominees and an increasingly polarized Senate. Also significant was the increased mobilization of interest groups. In sum, increased contentiousness seems largely to reflect the ideological polarization of American political elites.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876173024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876173024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0022381613000017

DO - 10.1017/S0022381613000017

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 283

EP - 299

JO - Journal of Politics

JF - Journal of Politics

SN - 0022-3816

IS - 2

ER -