Voting for justices: Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010

Charles M. Cameron, Jonathan P. Kastellec, Jee Kwang Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)


The contentiousness of Senate voting on Supreme Court nominations increased dramatically from 1937 to 2010. We identify four potential sources of the increase: (1) changes in the Senate; (2) changes in the nominees; (3) changes in the political environment; and, (4) changes in senators' evaluative criteria. Using new data and improved statistical techniques, we estimate a well-performing model of senators' individual voting choices on Supreme Court nominees. Simulations allow an evaluation of the contribution of the four classes of factors to increased contentiousness. The principal source of increased contentiousness was the combination of increasingly extreme nominees and an increasingly polarized Senate. Also significant was the increased mobilization of interest groups. In sum, increased contentiousness seems largely to reflect the ideological polarization of American political elites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-299
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Politics
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 1 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Voting for justices: Change and continuity in confirmation voting 1937-2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this