Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Original languageEnglish
JournalStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

Cite this

@article{703875f85b45423d9f35a72fe24112a9,
title = "Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.",
author = "James Nikopoulos",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006",
language = "English",
journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0039-3681",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.

AU - Nikopoulos, James

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006

M3 - Review article

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science

SN - 0039-3681

ER -