Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.

James Nikopoulos

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Original language	English
Journal	Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006
Publication status	Published - Oct 2018

Access to Document

@article{703875f85b45423d9f35a72fe24112a9,

title = "Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.",

author = "James Nikopoulos",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006",

language = "English",

journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A",

issn = "0039-3681",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.

AU - Nikopoulos, James

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006

DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006

M3 - Review article

SN - 0039-3681

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

ER -