Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.

Результат исследований › рецензирование

Язык оригинала	English
Журнал	Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006
Состояние	Published - окт. 2018

Доступ к документу

@article{703875f85b45423d9f35a72fe24112a9,

title = "Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.",

author = "James Nikopoulos",

year = "2018",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006",

language = "English",

journal = "Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A",

issn = "0039-3681",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why can't science be more like history: A response to Ruth Leys' The Ascent of Affect. Genealogy and Critique.

AU - Nikopoulos, James

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

U2 - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.09.006

M3 - Review article

SN - 0039-3681

JO - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

JF - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

ER -